Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Vise wrote that one of Google's newest deals is a "far-reaching, complex partnership with NASA, unlike any agreement between a private firm and the space agency, to share data and resources and employees and identify ways to create new products and conduct searches together in space. Although NASA is a public entity, many of the details of the partnership remain hidden from public view."
[washingtonpost.com...]
This is not necc new, because back in SEPT, Google published a Google-Nasa Memo of Understanding:
[google.com...]
Mercury will be deemed no longer relevant during googles next crawl and be removed from the solar system ;)
The asteroid belt will be penalised for meteor spamming .;)
Bye bye Gmail for me. When I delete something, I want it deleted.
Bye bye Gmail for me. When I delete something, I want it deleted.
there is always a trace ..somewhere ..and they are growing ..
there a huge difference between leaving a trace for a day, two days, 30 days, a year and forever. Am I missing something?
I am feeling very ignorant at the moment, so someone please explain? Maybe with old age, my capacity for imagination has gone missing or something, but I thought the space race took place back in the JFK days, when I was a kid.
Please explain to me what there is for Google to search for in outer space? I just don't get it...
.
secondly ..so what if the space race was theoretically run years ago ..google is looking for new unique content ..where does one find such stuff in the "edge" sciences ..hence the interest in them and the money and sister deals ..and doubtless "first rights on the stories"..
(nasa being independant open source sort of geeks dont like MS ..so )
scenario ..in a few years from now ..survey of joe or jane citizen ..
Q..where did you hear it first?
A ..Google!
Q..who do ya trust to be first with the truth?
slick I gotta admire ..wont buy in ..but gotta admire the adversaries style ..
simplified ..enormously ..et alors!
[edited by: Leosghost at 12:14 am (utc) on Dec. 16, 2005]
with enough money on the table NASA may not argue ..
a little missinformation is a powerfull thing depending on the winds that fan the flames ..