Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I have a site which ranks quite well in Google and I have decided to remove a large number (over 100) of pages which made up my link directory from my site and start from scratch with a new link directory, file-names, everything as many of the links are out of date or irrelevent.
My issue is whether I should put 301 redirects in place which redirect to the main page of the link directory(which I am keeping). If I do this, they will all point to the same page. Will this cause a problem with Google? Will it be seen as spamming?
Or should I just delete them and allow Google pick up on the 404's, of which there will be over a hundred. Could this have a negative effect on my site?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
I think the simple answer is that a 301 redirect is to be used when the content of a page has been permanently moved from one URL to another. A 404 is when an URL no longer exists. As each URL is supposed to be a unique resource, the safe option in your case would be to delete the pages with content that you no longer require, and leave it at that, except perhaps use a custom 404 page.
Of course... there may be better and more complex answers.
Does anyone have suggestions for removing an entire site from Google for the purposes of starting from scratch?
I wonder if Brett has stumbled upon the best way to remove pages from Google? It will be interesting to see what happens when he allows spiders back in.
I do want to try and avoid using the 404 as I would like to avoid having upwards of 100 broken links on the site! I hadn't considered using a 410 status code though it does sound quite appropriate. I want the SEs to know these pages are gone and not to index them anymore.
Is the 410 code used in a similar fashion to a 404?
Does anyone else have experience using this?
Will Google(and other SEs)once they encounter a 410 'respect it', in other words, will they cosider it a permanent removal?
Thanks again.