Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Saga. Part 5

         

Brett_Tabke

8:26 pm on Nov 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What say you?

Over and done with?

All done all through?

Dayo_UK

3:49 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)



Strange - I am not getting any problems accessing any part of Google.

ssjxxx

3:50 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Same here. I can get to my www.google.com DC, but that's the only one I have been able to connect to so far this morning. Could it be that this signals the end of J3? (finally!)

-S

fiu88

3:50 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



oh dear...just when I saw our listings come back to where they were pre-jagger..

sfgirl

3:52 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Colin H
"A post Christmas blitz may be on the cards for the google algo. This might be why the serps seems to be favouring big, established brands at present."

We are a big, established brand - been around for 10 years at same URL and are being hit by the update. Seems that pages comparing products are hit hardest, and individual product pages themselves are also slipping, despite recent SEO efforts (basic clean up, <H> tags, <alt> attributes + updated titles and descriptions and redone in css) - rolled out during Jagger update. A lot of our pages seemed to have started a big fall on 10/25.

The site is doing better than ever in Yahoo and MSN.

We do have canonical URL problems - not at the site level (www vs. non-www) but internal pages with 10 or more URLs for the same page. Cleaning this up and hoping for the best...

sfgirl

3:55 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



And our site at subdomain.example.com was hit the hardest of all. It has 1/2 the traffic of last year at this time , despite improvements to the site.

All of our SEO is very white hat by the way, and recently implemented, since there was not a whole lot of SEO before the Jagger update. Now basic SEO efforts + Jagger update seems to have made our sites dip in Google, but we're better off in Y & M.

Pico_Train

4:08 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



subdomain.domain.com is pretty much spam these days in Google's eyes.

Kangol

4:13 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes,
But I see in first 20 SERPs for a competitive keyword I watch 7 spamy subdomain.domain.com...

ssjxxx

4:13 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



subdomain.domain.com is pretty much spam these days in Google's eyes.

Not true. I have several sites that are subdomains of the same domain. They all rank well and most receive a fair amount of traffic from G.

-S

Pico_Train

4:18 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Good, keep your fingers crossed then.

sfgirl

4:23 pm on Nov 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



interesting. Our most popular part of our main site lives at a subdomain too. That is where our product pages and product comparison pages live that are doing sucky since Jagger. We do have pages in there that are doing ok though, just not our most important ones (and the bulk of our site)...
This 1356 message thread spans 136 pages: 1356