Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Has anyone seen this before?
[edited by: tedster at 12:04 pm (utc) on Oct. 5, 2005]
[edit reason] removed specifics [/edit]
Of course, experimenting with live serps and hence people's businesses and lives is OK.What are us content providers here for after all if it isn't to be constantly eperimented on?
Back to the hamster ball for me.
The search engines are there to try and help people find things on the internet, not to help people be found.
In my humble opinion Google should concentrate on improving it's serps rather than messing around with the appearance of the results.
Google is only able to concentrate on users first (and content providers last) whilst it's search outperforms the rest. Once the other engines catch up in serp result performance (or a new engine with new technology usurps Google entirely) Google will regret the way it treats content providers.
I already encourage my users to use Dogpile since, due to it's technological innovation, it gives the best results for commercial searches.
Shareholders! That is a much bigger problem for Google. How to reconcile profit whilst giving the best results to users?
Google is wide open to a technological innovation exactly as Google usurped Altavista. I bet it will be human rated search a la the product review websites we have today.