Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Back from Bourbonne at last

Time to name and confirm this update.

         

vinylrecordsuk

7:44 pm on Sep 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This update is as big as Bourbonne, I am surprised it did not get a new name and a seperate heading on this forum, I have returned to my pre-Bourbonne position, which is page 1 number 2 for my chosen keyphrase in a competitive field. I have re-gained the 50% of my business that I lost in June and I am of course very relieved, I do however find it hard to get too excited incase it happens again in the near future, once bitten twice shy.

A special thankyou to Webmaster World for keeping me informed during a very difficult 3 months. It is a shame that Google and Ebay, just 2 businesses have such enormous control over the economy and control so many peoples life's.

Nick

dgdclynx

9:12 am on Sep 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I seem to have recovered twenty places over the past three days but as I had dropped over a hundred that is little difference although my hits have increased.

dirty_marra

10:06 am on Sep 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I was seeing massive changes yesterday but everything seems to have reverted to normal. wierd!

chopin2256

5:11 pm on Sep 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yeah it doesn't look like an update to me because my bad site didn't regain positions (except its name, big deal), and my good site is staying in the same places.

disspy

5:49 pm on Sep 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well guys ... Read this long thread (take 2hrs for this) ... [webmasterworld.com...]

It was definitely an update. Google celebrates its 7th birthday and this update was a biggy one, I think with more changes then any before. Most of webmasters are screaming now and pulling the hair from their heads, but it's still too early to say what's really going on. It seems that everyone from us lost in average 30% traffic and this is enough to think there's an update on the way. I already spotted some weird signs on Google search and also a looooot of cloacking/spammer web site coming out as good placed SERPs! I just want believe Google will finish it this way. However, maybe the guys are improving some new methodology and new ranking techniques, who knows. It is possible that the guys who optimized their web sites will lose at most after this update.

All this are speculations, we just need to wait until we get some official information. Obviously the guy named GoogleGuy has lot to do within this update, but there's a hope he'll throw a look into WW to hear our reactions. And I must say the reactions are in more then 90% cases - negative! Maybe they want to destroy SEO cartel with this update ... Who knows?!? ;)

stargeek

5:57 pm on Sep 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"Maybe they want to destroy SEO cartel with this update"

thats been the goal for a long, long time.
and i'm pretty sure people from google are watching WebmasterWorld, as they always do.
Remember that they do not make money by servicing webmasters, they make money from thier advertisers and searchers, in that regard most SEO efforts are adverserial to the goal of google.

disspy

6:59 pm on Sep 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yeah ... Everything is possible ... Check out this conspiracy theory. Sounds intresting to me!

<snip>

Who knows ...

[edited by: engine at 2:11 pm (utc) on Sep. 28, 2005]
[edit reason] No urls, thanks. See TOS [webmasterworld.com] [/edit]

tictoc

7:39 am on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



looks like an update to me.. doesnt look like a good update looks like they have filtered it so much that the spam has came back in and taken over the serps. lots of directory sites and spam subsites with google ads on them!

vinylrecordsuk

8:34 am on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Am I the only one to think this was a good update?
I have recovered 50% of my business and every word on my site has neen indexed, where before nothing was.

Until Bourbonne my site had held a good position for seven years, Bourbonne wiped it out, even though it remained in the top 10, it was hardly ever found due to the indexing error.

A search on my favourite key phrase produces relevant results and I am number 1 for my business name too, which was also screwed during Bourbonne.

I have suffered for 3 months and struggled to stay in business, this update has made everything OK. I hope those who have been effected by this update recover their postitions too, but can't criticise google this time as for me, they got it right!

Nick

linkjack

2:49 pm on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



To stargeek

WOW! Finally someone who doesn't live in disney posted the truth. Spread the word stargeek, that's the attitude of the pros.

Bigmouths WILL get their sites dumped, this thread is the proof of it. Talk too much and Google WILL dump you.

stargeek

2:52 pm on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"WOW! Finally someone who doesn't live in disney posted the truth. Spread the word stargeek, that's the attitude of the pros."

thank you for the words of support.
though i feel like its only common sense.

linkjack

2:53 pm on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



vinyl records

you got yourself links from the royal navy! anyway your site is ok, brings back old memories indeed.

linkjack

3:01 pm on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



thank you for the words of support.
though i feel like its only common sense.

Don't take it for granted, stargeek. The ammount of idiocy in humankind can surprise you. And it will.

linkjack

3:05 pm on Sep 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



By the way: it's not an update. It's a bigmouth trap.

They tweak, and see reactions.

Judging by this thread, 90% of SEO's don't like it : so Google is going to keep it.

Everytime you whine one of their GoogleGuys gets a raise, because the only purpose of googleguy in life in a SEO forum is to be close to the enemy, as Machiavelli taught 300(?) years ago.

hunderdown

5:45 pm on Sep 29, 2005 (gmt 0)



I agree with those calling it a tweak. I have definitely seen an increase in Google referrals, of maybe 10-20%. I don't have the patience or the stats program to figure out the details, but it seems like a general increase spread out across the site.

Context: my site is a niche content site that has been around since 1996. I've always got what I think are good amounts of referrals from Google, and the numbers have climbed over the years. There was a small downtick earlier this year that may have been related to an update, but it also may have been caused by some work I did on my site. In any case I have never experienced the wild swings reported by others....

BillyS

6:23 pm on Sep 29, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



as Machiavelli taught 300(?) years

I think it's closer to 500 years...

stargeek

6:29 pm on Sep 29, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"I have definitely seen an increase in Google referrals"

so the changes you are seeing are being shown on www?

hunderdown

2:50 pm on Sep 30, 2005 (gmt 0)



so the changes you are seeing are being shown on www?

I don't understand what you are asking? Could you clarify? Shown where?

To restate what I said before, my logs report an increase in referrals from Google. A small increase, but unlikely to be random. So I agree with those who are calling what happened last week a "tweak," rather than an update. Of course, with millions of sites on the Web, a tweak could still drastically affect a small number of sites....

stargeek

4:38 pm on Sep 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hunderdown:
some people are watching changes on various datacenters that are not being served on www.google.com

if you are seeing an increase in referrals, it must meant hat whatever changes have caused this are being shown on www.google.com for a number of searchers.

rkhare

4:52 pm on Sep 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



any idea when PR update is coming?

ssjxxx

5:02 pm on Sep 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



any idea when PR update is coming?

I think that's something that we would all like to know.

hunderdown

7:06 pm on Sep 30, 2005 (gmt 0)



stargeek, thanks for the clarification. No, I'm not so, um, "stargeeky" as to check the data centers. I'm interested in results. Great nickname, by the way.

stargeek

7:26 pm on Sep 30, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hunderdown:
thanks for the compliments.

reseller

6:58 am on Oct 1, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



hunderdown

>>I agree with those calling it a tweak.<<

Good for you ;-)

Not good for the educational sites and sites with original contents which dropped out of the index or lost rankings on the serps. "calling it a tweak"?

This 53 message thread spans 2 pages: 53