Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I am afraid Google can consider spamming if you use css color for links, and without css the links are similar color as the backgroung
Right, I'm asking about the opposite of that though - there are no color settings within the HTML, all fonts/colors/link styles are done through CSS. As far as the HTML is concerned, all of the links are <a class="whatever" href="whatever.html">text</a> - but a few of the links, to maintain design consistency with a specific area, are not underlined and match the background.
So would that be considered SEO spam? The raw HTML looks perfectly normal, but through CSS some of the links do appear to be "hidden".
And since some of you are probably thinking of it, no, I'm not an SEO spammer looking for ways to beat the system :P I just want to make sure that my design isn't going to make Google think I am.
Also, why will G consider it spamming if you use CSS for link attributes? Don't most people do that if they use CSS? On one of my sites where I use CSS and clicked the "text only" link on the G cached page, I COULD still see everything, the links were not hidden, obviously because the links' color are a different color than the page background. So I guess in that case G couldn't consider it spamming.?
An example would be if {visibility:hidden} was used to hide a bunch of keywords that the webmaster only created to try and boast his/her rankings.
So they question is can google understand CSS to an extent where it can find hidden text/links which it clearly dislikes (from the google webmaster guidelines)?
Appologies if this is not what the question was!
And yes, it could be considered link spamming during a manual check if there is no indication that it is a link.
It is unlikely that googlebot would catch such things automatically.