Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I'm curious about a couple of possibilities. One is that a have a good number of links from related sites but most I've had for some time. The other is that there might but be a devaluation of older sites as mine has been around since 1996.
Any ideas on this?
This makes sense. If people are not continually linking to a site then Google may think the content has gone stale and devalue it. Are you getting new 'quality' links in consistently?
>The other is that there might but be a devaluation of older sites as mine has been around since 1996.
Why? There is no logical reason why old sites are no longer relevant.... unless they are no longer attracting links :)
"I think PR is going into retirement and banished into room 101."
They seem to think Google might be valuing pages that are freshed up regularly and to prefer incoming links if they are coming from newer or updated pages.
Whatever I do need to do some work on getting new related links. I haven't actively done anything for 2 or 3 years.
Getting above the newbie class of create links to create traffic requires addressing these questions.
PS if my answer seems hard Its because I am trying to answer these same questions.
Any ideas on this?
With sales of links from high PR sites, link exchange schemes (DP coop, link-vault, etc.) and perhaps increased use of SEO, I think there's some overall PR inflation occurring. Those who don't participate in these exchanges may lose a little as other related sites gain PR.
Just a hypothesis that I haven't yet tested out.
RFM