Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

What to do about removed site

         

samuel_ado

8:08 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hi all,

our site removed by google, i think the reason is "incoming guestbook links"... how can i clean up guestbook links? i didn't know that is a reason to remove site by google and i want to reindex our site but i don't know how?
appreciated your help

IanTurner

8:31 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I would very much doubt that guestbook links are the cause - as this would mean that a competing site could get you removed from Google, something they claim is almost impossible.

Shakil

8:37 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)



samuel,

welcome to webmasterworld.

You fail to mention the following:

How long had your site been in Google.
Whether it Guestbook Links were the only backlinks you had.
Was there a problem at the last crawl (server down etc)

Shak

Liane

8:40 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



samuel_ado,

I would think it has something to do with your "Reciprocal Link Exchange". Man that's a long page! Chances are pretty good that you are linking to more than one "bad neighbourhood"!

I didn't look at the rest of your site, but since I saw that link on your homepage ... I took a shot in the dark.

samuel_ado

8:43 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Shak...

>How long had your site been in Google. : 1,5 year
>Whether it Guestbook Links were the only backlinks you had. : no it had more than 70 links from high ranked pages except guestbook links
>Was there a problem at the last crawl (server down etc) : none

samuel_ado

8:47 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



liane..

i know and i will change it soon (max. 100 in a page...)
so i need to change too many things on the web-site and i am learning when i read this forum...

Chris_R

8:47 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think Laine is on target....

Alltheweb might miss the 20,549 pages of reciprocal backlinks, but google won't.

If you want to use such a technique I might suggest taking a lower profile.

you might get away with 100 or so - 20,000 is a different story.

either way your chances of getting back into google with that domain are about as good as Larry Page inviting me over for dinner.

Short answer is to give up and start over.

samuel_ado

9:21 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ohhhhh sorry

Liane

9:33 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



No problem samuel_ado, but as you can see, your post and my reply have been removed by the moderatror as posting URL's is strictly against the Terms of Service [webmasterworld.com] for this site. Please use sticky mail if you'd like to send a message to any individual members.

Your site has already been removed by Google and it is likely due to your Reciprocal Link Exchange programme. I may be wrong ... but I think its likely.

There may be other things which may have caused your removal. I think your best bet is to do a lot more reading and a lot more question asking around here before taking any drastic measures.

Have you had a look at Webmaster Guidelines [google.com]? If not, do so. I am sure it will help you discover where you may have gone wrong.

samuel_ado

9:37 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



thanks a lot... i keep it and study on it...

rfgdxm1

11:14 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I would very much doubt that guestbook links are the cause - as this would mean that a competing site could get you removed from Google, something they claim is almost impossible.

And, this would be very trivial. Pay some bored teenage relative to add a competitor's site to hundreds of guestbooks. And, if Google was significantly worried about guestbook links, a much better strategy than penalizing sites would be to work on algorithmically filtering most of them out. Most guestbooks are using standard scripts, and it would be very easy for the bot to spot these, and just say "I won't count any of these links at all". For all we know, Google may have already done this. Just because a guestbook link shows up with the link: command doesn't mean that Google hasn't flagged it to be ignored by the algo.

Personally, I doubt guestbook links could do much good for any site. Almost all guestbooks have tons of links, which means that each transfers little value, and typically guestbooks have low PR. Now, if you could find some guestbook with very few links and a PR of 8... ;)

Also, it seems to me the very idea of penalizing for guestbook links is wrong. Remember, webmasters *want* people to sign guestbooks. Most people who have guestbooks do so for vanity. This is a way to get feedback from users. This is how they know people found and enjoyed their site. And, some people just like to sign guestbooks. I know of one woman likes this. She *always* signs the guestbook if a site has one. She has to of signed many hundreds of guestbooks. Her reason has nothing to do with search engines, and she doesn't even know what Google PageRank means. Thus, if Google were to penalize for this she would be an innocent victim. And, many people sign guestbooks not for search engine reasons, but instead of a way of promoting their site. They aren't trying for higher PR, but instead are hoping that people some people will click on that link, and thus get the site some traffic. Hey, if someone wants to give you what amounts to a free ad on their site, why turn down the opportunity?

rfgdxm1

11:21 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I would think it has something to do with your "Reciprocal Link Exchange". Man that's a long page! Chances are pretty good that you are linking to more than one "bad neighbourhood"!

And, unless this is being solely done for legitimate reasons, such as exchanging links with webmasters of sites on the same topic, then basically you *are* part of a bad neighborhood. A link farm basically is just a bunch of sites linking to each other. Thus, unless all these reciprocal links he has are for an obviously legit reason, he is basically asking for trouble by doing this. And, there also is that concern you'll end up linking to a bad neighborhood. Your site may be clean, but are you sure all the sites you link to are also?

jomaxx

11:32 pm on Jan 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As far as cleaning up guestbook links, just send the site owners an email saying that they're now linking to a site that's been banned by Google as a link farm. They'll do it. LOL

P.S. Where did the 20,000 guestbooks signed figure come from? Was that a guess, or did Chris_R look up the actual number before the URL was removed?

rfgdxm1

12:01 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I presume that 20,000 was just a guess. However, the number shouldn't matter, because a competitor or just the malicious could sign your site to any number of guestbooks. However, in a case of 20,000 that could only happen by someone up to no good. Although, I can imagine in a case of someone who spends a lot of time surfing the Net, if they always signed guestbooks when they found them they could easily amass many hundreds after a few years. I have a suspicion that Google has tweaked the algo to spot and ignore guestbook links.

jomaxx

3:55 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There are also bots that try to sign guestbooks on your behalf. If anyone did get to 20,000 guestbook links, I hope they didn't add them by hand! Talk about a waste of your life.

Chris_R

4:51 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The 20,000 was NOT a guess, but as it was a dash domain - the numbers could be combined with the non dashed domain - I looked at about a dozen and they were all for the exact domain mentioned. There was over 20k for all the web and about 800 SHOWING for google [which doesn't have the dashed problem]. It is safe to say based on google only showing high pr pages that the number is in the thousands.

Everything I saw at ATW WAS NOT a guestbook either. It was other pages and domains with hundreds of interlinked pages. In google - 3 out of 10 on one page were guestbooks - the other 7 were just interlinked pages.

Keep in mind - I am not PICKING on this person for doing it, just mentioning that you can't really expect to stay below the radar with the amount of effort I saw put into it - nor can you expect google to put you back in....

Also CSS was used to make a couple things links that didn't look like links - google might not like that either.

rfgdxm1

4:57 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Keep in mind - I am not PICKING on this person for doing it, just mentioning that you can't really expect to stay below the radar with the amount of effort I saw put into it - nor can you expect google to put you back in....

But Google would need to find evidence a competitor didn't do this. Since there were some other fishy things about the site, then that combined with those guestbook links should be enough. Anyone trying to help their site by signing guestbooks had better make sure the site itself is squeaky clean.

Chris_R

5:07 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Ok - I am again not trying to pick on this person - but while I can't say a competitor did not enter some guestbooks - the multiple domains with the same dns is a different story.

BigDave

5:45 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Also there were a lot of things in the source, that would be "troublesome" to a human review.

Google does not penalize for guestbooks, but lots of guestbook entries look suspicious.

Google does not use meta keywords, but several K of meta keywords while doing a review might look like the work of someone would be interested in trying to spam search engines.

Keyword stuffing comments wouldn't have an effect on Google's algorithm, but once again, makes them look like a spammer.

Using CSS to make links look like regular text probably won't get you banned, but it sure doesn't look that good either.

Being in an industry known for spam problems.

Now if you have all that going against you, do you think they will give you the benefit of the doubt if they find *anything* that is even slightly in the "against the rules" category?

rfgdxm1

6:04 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



My guess is that anyone out there who is seriously spamming guestbooks thinking it'll get them somewhere with search engines almost surely will be doing fishy things with the code of their site, or other irregularities. For no other reason that doing things fishy with the site itself seems a far more effective strategy to scam search engines. While I've heard isolated rumors floating around that a small number of sites have used guestbook spamming successfully, I haven't seen much evidence this has happened to a material degree. I suspect the reason is most guestbooks have lots of links, and low PR. You just can't get very far with them. I'd think the trick is to figure out some way of finding the rare guestbooks with high PR and few links that nobody else knows about. These have gotta be few and far between. PR tends to be grossly overestimated by many as an algo factor. You just ain't likely by signing guestbooks enough PR boost to really help your SERPs. Unless of course you can find that mythical PR9 guestbook with only 2 links on it. ;)

BigDave

6:17 am on Jan 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Unless of course you can find that mythical PR9 guestbook with only 2 links on it.

No problem!

add
127.0.0.1 www.google.com

to your hosts file and put in guestbook.php in your root directory. Go to www.google.com/guestbook.php and check your PR, it should be PR9 and you will be the only one able to sign it. ;)