Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

INK and Google

Does Google use the inktomi database?

         

Smiley

10:53 am on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have pages designed as doorways for Inktomi (through PT before they where penalised!) that are now showing up and getting traffic from Google.

Google could not have found these doorway pages by crawling the site as they has no inbound links.

So either google must look at lnk or get feedback from their toolbars? Anyone seen similar?

tigger

10:56 am on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I would say google has found your ink pages by crawling your site, it's quite a busy spider :)

Smiley

11:13 am on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So it can find pages that have no links to them? How does it do that?

taxpod

11:19 am on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Referror logs for one thing.

diddlydazz

11:22 am on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



There was a discussion on whether or not Google followed links via the toolbar.

I will try and find the thread.

Here: [webmasterworld.com...]

Dazz

Marcia

12:11 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>Referror logs for one thing.

Here's what Google says about "secret pages" from #6 in their Tips for Webmasters [google.com].

As soon as someone follows a link from your "secret" server to another web server, it is likely that your "secret" URL is in the referer tag, and it can be stored and possibly published by the other web server in its referer log. So, if there is a link to your "secret" web server or page on the web anywhere, it is likely that Googlebot and other "web crawlers" will find it.

There really are no secrets that are 100% safe as long as there's any possibility of a link. Then, there are some webmasters around who choose sites and without asking or getting permission add them to links pages or directories. So there can be links people don't know about, especially if they've had good rankings at popular search engines.

panicbutton

6:09 am on Aug 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Marcia's suggestion of a search engine finding pages with no links to them, or from log files, is certainly, ahem, interesting. I think however that the most likely reason is that - as part of the AOL/Google deal - AOL insisted that Google do a one-off ingest of Ink's database to keep AOL'ers (who may be accustomed to finding certain sites via AOL) happy. No doubt they will be scrubbed from Google in due course but they should ease the transition for AOL.

It could be a bit of a worry really, particularly if what you thought was safely quarantined from Google (for Ink's eyes only) is now showing up and may trigger a PR0!

tigger

6:41 am on Aug 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



panicbutton

I've had ink pages in google for sometime 12mths+, I'm sure it's just a case of following links

Josk

8:27 am on Aug 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



AlltheWeb has (mistakenly?) indexed ICQ, so I could see Google doing the same. All they need to is index a log file that has queries from a search engine and follow the links back to the searchengine, and onto the Inktomi-only page...

GoogleGuy

9:38 am on Aug 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Uh, no. We don't use Inktomi's database. We prefer to crawl our own pages. :)