Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google in the year 2009. Semantic web and RDF

         

luma

5:01 pm on Jul 27, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Ftrain.com: August 2009: How Google beat Amazon and Ebay to the Semantic Web [ftrain.com]

This is a fictitious article about Google in the year 2009. It's based on the believe that RDF (Resource Description Format) will be widely used by then. This could enable Google to become a global marketplace and beat eBay and Amazon at it.

vitaplease

12:40 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



nice Future Shock reading, Luma..

All we do is search

from [redherring.com...]

But "searching" can be a very wide subject..certainly after an IPO.

Call it "we help you search for what others deliver, at a commission"

[answers.google.com...] is a beginning.

Personally I find these options fascinating.

One service I would applaud is a universal and complete search for (scientific) articles within a Google tab, where I can get the found article delivered by PDF format within seconds at a price which is never above the original price of the single magazine the article was published in. I know bits and pieces of these services exist, but not with a good search module, not with that speed, not with that price and not from a database containing all known publications.

But this is something that probably belongs in this thread: ;)
[webmasterworld.com...]

danny

12:51 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



vitaplease, I'd love to see the scientific citation/publishing industry opened up... I believe strongly that for a scientific article to be accepted as part of "the record" - to be recognised by universities for promotion/performance measures, for example - it should have to be made "free content", and thus freely available online.

Then Google could build an entirely separate full-text index of academic research, with all kinds of fancy search and citation tracking tools.

[edited by: danny at 12:58 pm (utc) on July 28, 2002]

Chris_R

12:57 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I love the cartoon at the top :)
I would not be suprised at all if google and amazon have a partnership down the road. Both would complement each other beautifully.

Although eBay is profitable - only Amazon and Google really have my respect as Internet powerhouses.

eBay got lucky - sort of like yahoo, except you pretty much have to use ebay for auctions...

Chris_R

12:58 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Oh - and I also would love to see google have a acedemic research engine. I would pay for that...

vitaplease

12:59 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Danny,

Google should convince publishers that having the full content of articles spidered, means they can be better and more frequently found. It does not mean that the full text article is freely available to everyone (just the snippet or the resumé). Publishers could make a tremendous amount of money it they confided their trust (and made the articles at reasonable price available) to something like such a Google service.

FAST is touching this subject with [scirus.com...]

chiyo

1:16 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I used to work in academic publishing for 10 years for a UK company. Their journals were priced for libraries and sometimes were priced at 1,000 to 2,000 Pounds per year for 12 issues (say 60 to 100 articles.

Lexis Nexus and Blackwells and the major academic publihers and agents make massive amounts of money for publishing research that is in most part paid for by governments through universities.

The Net is a major threat to their middle man status, but we aint seeing it yet!

danny

1:37 pm on Jul 28, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm with chiyo - I think we need to change the fundamentals of the existing academic publishing system, not just improve the profits of those currently running it.

This thread should probably be in foo, but Google might well have a role in forthcoming upheavals... they came out of academia, remember!

rcjordan

10:05 pm on Aug 1, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



W3C hails Semantic Web, Web services scenarios [computerworld.com]

2009? (in the first article) Must have been a typo, he meant 2006.

GoogleGuy

9:44 am on Aug 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Good points in that article, but my favorite has to be the Googlebot picture. I gotta get that on a T-shirt..

rjohara

6:34 pm on Aug 2, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



That was a fun article on a really interesting topic. Something Brett posted once about searching calendars got me thinking here on WebmasterWorld about the semantic web [webmasterworld.com] a while ago. There are a few pointers in that post to other interesting items.