Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.167.40.25

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

When does a site become a Supplemental Result?

My own results confuse me.

     
1:39 pm on Dec 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 30, 2003
posts:103
votes: 0


Google lists a few of my pages as "Supplemental Results" that I did not expect to be listed as such.

My own definition of a Supplemental Result is not fitting for my own case which is why I would appreciate your comments towards this.

Thanks
Trax

7:15 pm on Dec 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 23, 2003
posts:801
votes: 0


I've seen several scenarios, some of which I don't understand.

One that I've seen that I do understand is when I was moving files about and I marked the (old copies of the) HTMLs file with a Meta robots NOINDEX, FOLLOW
At this point, the files became Supplemental in Google.

So that's one reason to put on your list!
DerekH

7:18 pm on Dec 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 13, 2003
posts:95
votes: 0


I noticed about 100 'supplemental' results out of the 450 pages or so for more site.

In my case they're all duplicates of other pages in the index - just accessed via a different path - ie [mydomain.com...] instead of [mydomain.com...]

May be worth verifying that the supplementals aren't duplicates of other pages you have in the index...

12:23 am on Dec 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 30, 2003
posts:103
votes: 0


as far as I've checked I can deny both scenarios in my case....
Dup content could (as far as I know) be another reason but I can not validate this in my case either...

What else could the reason be? any comments appreciated :)

12:47 am on Dec 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rfgdxm1 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 12, 2002
posts:4479
votes: 0


One of the most common scenarios I've seen for a page to be a Supplemental Result is that it is an orphan page. Note that a page need not be truly an orphan; only that Google thinks it is. If Google can't spider pages linking to that page, this would make it an orphan to Google.
1:39 am on Dec 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:Dec 29, 2003
posts:5428
votes: 0


I've also seen supplementals on sites that were no longer spidered frequently /slow death kind of a thing.
6:12 am on Dec 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:May 2, 2003
posts:51
votes: 0


I agree with Robert. I think what he said is absolutely right.
6:41 am on Dec 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 8, 2003
posts:177
votes: 0


restructuring your site without making 301/302. After the next deep crawl the suplemental results are gone and replaced by the new pages.

Another thing can be that your site was down when googlebot tried to visit

Googlebot in both above scenario will be served a 404 error.

9:08 pm on Dec 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


A page may not be a Supplemental Result for all keyword searches!

I have some pages where an email address has been removed. The pages are still spidered, indexed and cached. The pages appear as normal for many searches, but when searching for that email address, the same page does appear in the results, and is then marked as a supplemental result. The snippet shows the old email address, but the real page does not (as it was removed many months ago). The cache does NOT show it either!

9:22 pm on Dec 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 23, 2003
posts:801
votes: 0


I agree with Robert. I think what he said is absolutely right.

Pardon me for being dim, but who is Robert?
I don't see a post by Robert
DerekH

11:22 pm on Dec 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member powdork is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 13, 2002
posts:3346
votes: 0


I believe he was referring to Rfgdxm1.
I have a site I took offline in August. It still shows up as a supplemental result and the pages still exist in the cache. has Google taken over the work of archive.org?
11:23 pm on Dec 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member steveb is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2002
posts:4652
votes: 0


It may have been going on longer, but at least for four days or so, some Supplemental listings show a recent cache (like a week ago), rather than one from March or whenever. But... the keyword search that brings this page up as a Supplemental listing is not to be found in the displayed cache.

With such bollocksed up data storage it is a wonder they can find anything to rank accurately.

11:26 pm on Dec 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member zeus is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 28, 2002
posts:3443
votes: 1


Many of us who also have troubles with dublicated content because Google cant tell the difference between a site redirecting to a original site or hijacker sites, has pages listed as supplemental results.
8:41 pm on Dec 13, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


>> the keyword search that brings this page up as a Supplemental listing is not to be found in the displayed cache <<

I have been reporting this "feature" for the last year now. It is oft overlooked.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members