Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.147.221

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Does Random Content Fool Google?

     
5:51 pm on Mar 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 20, 2003
posts:146
votes: 0



I was wondering whether random content will
fool the google freshbot?

i.e would random elements like chaning
the title/page copy help in the times
when google is unstable?

2:20 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 20, 2003
posts:146
votes: 0


Does anyone have any feedback on random content on home pages.

On first impressions it seems to fool google thinking your pages are being updated.

4:45 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 31, 2003
posts:39
votes: 0


I have a cron job set up at 3am everyday which changes the 3 featured products on my homepage - it fools google and keeps the customers happy as the site looks fresh.
8:04 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 11, 2004
posts:38
votes: 0


It's possible. But consider this: Universities now have programs that can detect plagiarism in term papers and essays in split seconds by comparing text with a large sample of existing work. They are something like 99% accurate.

Why wouldn't Google employ something similar to detect cheaters?

8:15 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member heini is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 31, 2001
posts:4404
votes: 0


Fooling? Cheating? Complete nonsense IMO. If you change a page - you change it. If you do that randomly or with a well thought out plan doesn't matter, neither to bots nor to humans. Both evaluate a page based on reputation and content. Okay, Google cares a bit more about reputation, perhaps too much. That in turn means constant changes on a page alone doesn't bring any benefit.
9:22 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 28, 2003
posts:292
votes: 0


I think it's probably smart enough to realize you shift from 2-3 different versions. Just go in and update your site. It's easier, not cheating, and makes your site better.
11:50 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 3, 2003
posts:785
votes: 0


Hey...just update your site daily for your visitors and the bots will respond favorably...give your visitors fresh daily content...they will appreciate you for this...if you can automate this...more power to you..
back to work for me...
11:58 pm on Mar 6, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 4, 2002
posts:1687
votes: 0


Trying to fool Google is a bit of a fool's game. You don't need to, anyway. The bot continues to be very interested in sites that it should be interested in.
12:04 am on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from CA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member encyclo is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 31, 2003
posts:9074
votes: 6


Random content is a perfectly legitimate tool - for example, a random quotation at the foot of the page (like Slashdot), random image gallery, etc. Loads of sites are doing it. I don't see any problem for Googlebot, and it would probably register as an updated page.
1:24 am on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 9, 2003
posts:503
votes: 0


All I change is the homepage date. Nothing else is touched on the homepage but I'm always altering/adding other pages within the site (these other pages are not crawled as often as the homepage).

Google checks my home page pretty much every day and all I do is change a date.

Simon.

4:26 am on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 31, 2003
posts:1316
votes: 0


I think PR is what keeps Googlebot interested, not freshness.
4:32 am on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from GB 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Feb 10, 2002
posts:931
votes: 3


What keeps googles searchers happy?
Good fresh content¿¿¿¿
Why fool when you can do it properly?
If you can do that with a 'programme' all well and good.Fooling is short term, doing it is long term, IMHO.
1:40 pm on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Mar 9, 2003
posts:2099
votes: 8


On first impressions it seems to fool google thinking your pages are being updated.

Surely they are being updated, though?

I tried this about a year ago on my front page. I had a grid of four elements, each one a photograph and some accompanying text with links to features inside my site. I set up a pool of about 30 elements and a javascript to shift the elements forward every minute. So over a period of minutes, if a reader kept returning to the homepage, they would see ABCD, followed by BCDE, CDEF etc.

I wouldn't classify this as 'fooling' anyone. It strikes me as a perfectly legitimate way to keep the page looking fresh and different every time a reader returns... (though the refresh rate was probably too frequent).

However I scrapped it, because obviously the javascript meant nothing to the robots, so to them it looked like there was very little content on the page.

I'd love to reintroduce it at some point though in a format comprehensible to robots as well as humans. How are you implementing the randomization, TheSubtleKnife? Are you using a server-side script?

1:48 pm on Mar 7, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 2, 2004
posts:26
votes: 0


Server side scripting makes this easy enough, we use ASP.

Our sites sell widgets, each site has upto 120 different types of widgets. Each site shows 5 "Featured Widgets" on the home page (a short description and a photograph), these are picked at random from our widgets database.

Seems to work okay for us, and it looks like it helps Google crawl all of our widget detail pages.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members