Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Penalty (not complete ban) on a domain?

Nothing to do with the "Flordia" update...

         

digitalpoint

7:01 pm on Dec 1, 2003 (gmt 0)



It's not my site, but I'm a moderator there... there is a domain that in the beginning of August, Google was reporting 92 links. Now it's been reporting 1 for months (most of the links are PR6 and PR7). And the links have not been removed.

So basically I'm just curious if there is some sort of penalty applied to the domain without it being a full ban? Is that possible?

Google's help email was used, but it was pretty canned/generic responses

- Shawn

phoenix09

4:04 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I can't speak for anyone else, but this happened to my site recently, it was number one for a wide range of topics that directly and negatively affected a prominent customer of google's, lots of traffic, they stopped spidering it until I removed the topic, then they started spidering it again, but it was not banned during this process.

DRGather

4:09 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hmmmm... I guess if it's not Billie boy and M$ trying to take over the computing world it's the big *G*. Was there any other evidence besides they stopped and then restarted spidering? How long was the break?

phoenix09

4:36 am on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The break occured after I installed a user forum for this topic, which was then used by the company in question's techs to spread their nonsense, I kicked them off, shortly after the site was not getting spidered anymore.

I removed the topic and the forum section and the site was spidered fully 3 days later.

Given the fact that google had just signed a new deal with this company a few weeks earlier, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a request was made to stop spidering the site.

I've watched the spider stats since the site went up and this has never happened before.

This is what a company looks like that is heading for a huge IPO, once I realized what was happening and just how much money was involved I dumped the content since my site would have been off google anyway within a few weeks, it was however nice to see that they didn't really care that much once the offending material was gone, and it wasn't worth it to me to argue the point, since they wouldn't have admitted it anyway.

But it is a nice lesson, makes you remember that google is not some mystical entity floating pure above the clouds, but is a company just like any other, which means of course the bottom line is number one, so whatever that bottom line needs is what is done.

panic

7:33 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This is what a company looks like that is heading for a huge IPO, once I realized what was happening and just how much money was involved I dumped the content since my site would have been off google anyway within a few weeks, it was however nice to see that they didn't really care that much once the offending material was gone, and it wasn't worth it to me to argue the point, since they wouldn't have admitted it anyway.

If that were true, then how come the paid inclusion forums are being spidered for WebmasterWorld?

phoenix09

9:14 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



<<
If that were true, then how come the paid inclusion forums are being spidered for WebmasterWorld?
>>

Excuse me if I scratch my head. I can't follow your logic here at all. Webmasterworld.com is the premier web development website on the internet, what I was doing had absolutely nothing to do with what webmasterworld is doing. I had few rules, people could slag the google client in question to their hearts content, and they did, to the point that pretty much any search for such problems would take you to my site, which is of course why I had to deal with kicking their techs off.

I don't blame google at all for doing this, by the way, I have to do things for my clients too that I don't like to keep the cash flowing, that doesn't mean I'm always happy to do them, but I do do them. Business is business, unfortunately.

If this helps clear it up for you, good.

panic

11:41 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It sounded to me like you were essentially saying that anything that badmouths Google is ranked poorly in Google.

That being said, the paid inclusion forums badmouth Google from time to time. These pages are clearly spidered by Googlebot.

My question to you was : If G deindexes sites that badmouth G, why is everything in the paid inclusion forum still in G?

-p

phoenix09

11:51 pm on Dec 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oh, I see, a misunderstanding, no, my site was badmouthing a major google client, not google. Google is just google, although I don't expect the google we know and somewhat love to exist within a year of the IPO. Sort of like Microsoft was once, long ago, a pretty cool company, full support, free, full product documentation, free, etc, and now they are Microsoft the monopoly.

Because google is doing this IPO it's critical for them to get their cash flow situation to the very highest level before the stock issue occurs, this means less emphasis on high end search, more emphasis on taking care of their clients and their primary income generators, such as adwords, which from what I've read in these forums are the primary target of the new algorythm, that is, increase income from adwords at the expense of their previously fairly unbiased search results. We've seen this before with other search engines.

Anyway, I just found it interesting to be on the receiving end of this new reality, it was predictable, which is why I was watching to see if it would happen, and it did. So no surprise, just an ongoing education.

digitalpoint

12:01 am on Dec 3, 2003 (gmt 0)



That's not the issue with this site... the site is being indexed, and shows in the search results... it's just very strange that links and PageRank are pretty much completely ignored for it (a "link:" query in Google used to yield over 100, the links are high (PR7) PageRank from all over the place, so they should be reported, but they aren't.

- Shawn

phoenix09

1:13 am on Dec 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oh,that's interesting too, I've noticed that google's link: function is not working very accurately, that's been for a while now, but it sounds like you are having a more extreme version of that, my site was still being listed on google too. This is worth learning more about I'd say.

PatrickDeese

1:32 am on Dec 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



phoenix09: Any chance you have Godaddy hosting? I only ask because it was documented that Godaddy was blocking Googlebot from crawling sites hosted by them.

digitalpoint: Is there any chance that the links that the site you mention are owned by the same company, on the same server, or otherwise related?

Are they reciprocal links?

panic

1:32 am on Dec 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've noticed that google's link: function is not working very accurately

I don't ever remember it working accurately.

phoenix09

3:02 am on Dec 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes, that's what I meant to say, I've never seen the link function work accurately either, nice to hear that others have noticed too, but it seems that digitalpoint has experienced some new twist on this particular behavior, or a new tweak in the algorythm.

It wasn't actually that the googlebot was blocked entirely, it just was hitting only its entry page and stopping, always, after the above events occured, it was very unique behavior which I've never seen on any of my sites, and which wasn't happening on any of my other sites at that time, it was very clear what was happening, although I'd be curious to know just what it is google can and can't make their spider do.

No, I'm not hosted on godaddy, I'm hosted on a top quality hoster.

panic

6:29 am on Dec 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It wasn't actually that the googlebot was blocked entirely, it just was hitting only its entry page and stopping, always, after the above events occured, it was very unique behavior which I've never seen on any of my sites, and which wasn't happening on any of my other sites at that time, it was very clear what was happening

I'm having the same problem with one of my domains. What did you do to fix this?

-p

phoenix09

4:37 pm on Dec 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm having the same problem with one of my domains. What did you do to fix this?

I deleted the content, which was sort of a drag sine it was getting such excellent results, but it was either that or put up a new domain name, minus the offending content. Since I made no money off the content, and it was getting to be a lot of work maintaining it, letting it go was an easy decision.

I can't say what is causing it in your case however, since I don't know what your site is dealing with, or if the cause is related.

I'm still seeing unusual activity, or inactivity, but that might now be because of the Florida thing, I'll have to see.

panic

11:22 pm on Dec 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



There's no Google bashing on my page at all, but I'm just curious as to why on my index page is being indexed. My other pages are definitely being crawled, but not indexed.

Anyhow, I'll try changing my index page to see if maybe I can get my other pages indexed.