Forum Moderators: open
Thanks.
A member starts a thread asking what is the best format for filename in Google's index, whether the seperate words with-hyphens, with_underscores, or with%20spaces. Other member note that in the past, GoogleGuy has suggested or hinted that hyphens are best. He now says is doesn't matter much.GoogleGuy Says:
Shouldn't matter much. %20 is just ugly though. :)
I remember at one point GG saying that dashed domains with keywords offer a bit of an advantage because G will parse dashes but not underscores. Not sure if that still applies or not.
Maybe Google has finally created the perfect algo - as soon as you stop optimising a page it rises ;)
GoogleGuy Says:
Shouldn't matter much. %20 is just ugly though. :)
Just wondering if anyone else has noticed the same thing. If not then I'll have to assume the unhyphenated pages for the most part are just optimized better.
hazard and lawboy, thanks also for your input but the page names themselves wouldn't have much bearing on the rankings.
I guess I should have asked the question like this in the first place:
Has anyone ever optimized two pages similarly (same keywords, same techniques) and used a hyphenated page name for one of the pages and underscores for the other? If so, did you notice any advantages using underscores over hyphens or vice versa?
The reason I started this thread is because hyphens make more sense, but I'm seeing better results with underscores (all things being almost equal). And though the page name doesn't matter that much, everything adds up. And I'm wondering if there is a much bigger reason for the unexpected results - such as hyphenated pages being red flags for SEO - or if it's just coincidence.
I doubt seriously that the hyphen issue will ever make or break a page's position.
I started using hyphens and underscores when G stopped partial word matching. I use underscores for subdirectory names and file names. They're not legal in domain names. I have good ranking regardless.
I've noticed that many people still seem to be looking for the one factor that will get them ranking. There isn't one. It's a combination of things. If one factor worked everybody would use it and the results would be the same as they are now because it wouldn't change anything.
I have good ranking regardless.
many people still seem to be looking for the one factor that will get them ranking
Like I said, hyphens make more sense, but I'm seeing better results with underscores for nearly identical pages. I was kind of hoping someone would chime in and say "yeah I did that too and the pages named with hyphens/underscores ranked better than pages named with underscores/hyphens".
I could try using hyphens, underscores, and nothing on different pages. There are many other factors, though, so the pages must be very similar to see the effect of the hyphen thing. The question is, how does one conduct a controlled experiment without creating duplicate pages? Does anyone have any suggestions?
H1:(Title1)
H2:(Title2)
H3:(Title3)
Sentance1:Get great blue widgets made by Company. Take advantage of our blue widget sale for big savings.
Sentance2: Get excellent blue widgets from Company. Check out our blue widget sale for huge savings.
Sentance3: Get wonderful blue widgets at Company. See our blue widget sale section for immense savings.
Have 2 or 3 paragraphs with the text written like this. Have very little code and keep it exactly the same on each page. Link to all 3 pages from the same page. And report back in 1 or 2 months with your findings. :)
<added>Actually you probably only need 2 pages because an underscore and no separator should have the same effect</added>