Forum Moderators: open
a few months ago, my company and one competitor sold the same brand of widgets. Then he switched brands.
Obviously, his site gets not updated very frequently by Google. Where our site shows "last updatet Sep 7", his shows no date at all. As a consequence, if you search for "our" widgets, his page still shows up in Google. If you click through, the page shows his new brand of widgets. If you go to the cached results, the old widget show up.
Of course if someone searches for "our" widget brand, I don't want his page to show up. So my question is if there is a way to have his pages updated by Google? Would it be legal, if I would submit his URL to Google? The form always speaks of "your URL"?
And if I would do so, could it be that I open up a can of worms? His presence in Google is rather weak. He has a PR of 3 (we go by 5). We have 62 backlinks in Google, he has 2. He has 110 elements indexed (searched via "company site:www.company.com"), we have 550. I don't want to see his results and his presence in Google improving only because I tried to get ONE page updated.
Any advice?
However, I would check their source code before doing so to make sure that what you know what YOU will now be telling Google to look at.
actually I thought about this also. PLacing the link would not be a problem - and since we are very frequently revisited by Googlebot it should only be a matter of a couple of days.
But NAMING the link would be a problem:
a) "World's worst widgets" would be illegal in my country, plus it might make a few of my visitors go have a look
b) Making the link white-on-white would be penalized by Google
c) Naming the link "Btw, here's our competitor" would do the trick, but obviously would be arther silly thing to do when it comes to human visitor psychology
d) The only possible way would be a feature compariosn of widgets were (hopefully :-) our widgets are superior, with a link to his site as distributor of the "other" widgets. But this is quite a lot of work for me to do because in my country, feature comparisons of competitive products are required by law to be complete and truthful. Attornies are beattling (and making good money btw.) over what "complete" means, but the bottom line is that you can't pick only a handful of features or only the ones which are good for yourself...
Don't under estimate this one. I use it all the time. It makes a statement....."Here are the competitors, we are so confident that you will choose us over them we decided to make your search easy by highlighting the competition".
That may not work for every psychology in the world....but it is a red rag to a bull in the USA....guaranteed to get you the sale!