Forum Moderators: open
Not only them, it's msn shopping also. It throws all pre-conceived ideas about ranking relevancy or scoring criteria right out the window. There's been a real serious problem since indexing dynamic URLs so freely.
I just checked on a site I watch and it was knocked out, out of a total of 6 million pages returned, by an msn shopping aspx page with a long dynamic URL that's nothing more than affiliate links - right in the # 1 spot. One single shopping page on that huge site that's SUPPOSED to be an ISP, if I remember correctly. No PR, guaranteed no quality inbound links with anchor text, just riding on what was orignally the site to begin with.
What's turning up has nothing to do with relevancy, spamazon and msn shopping. They're nothing more than affiliate sites (masquerading as soemthing else_ and should be reported to ODP for removal as such. ;)
/claus
Here's the problem. Currently, if you search for "search engine optimisation", for example, Google will ask "Did you mean: search engine *optimization*?".
I find it bothersome that Google.ie and Google.co.uk ask this question. I imagine it is a headache for teachers in the UK and Ireland, when their pupils' spellings are being "corrected" by Google.
I think it would be better if Google simply said:
"Try also the US spelling: search engine optimization."
Or something to that effect. I think it would be educational to know that there are two different versions of the spelling.
This technique could also be applied to words for which alternative spellings aren't currently suggested, e.g. colour/color.
Just a tip, but I think those of you in North America may not be aware of how annoying it is for us users of British English. (And no -- we're not going to change our spelling habits anytime soon!)
If nothing else, think how much free press coverage such a move could get in the UK media :-)