Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google calculator

Following AlltheWeb but with less units in conversion

         

Allergic

4:55 pm on Aug 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



[google.com...]

killroy

7:34 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Gotta Love this for geek-factor:

the square root of the answer to life, the universe and everything over 2 = 3.24037035

;)

SN

NeverHome

7:45 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



1 google = 600 + 60 + 6

... For the google-watchers amongst us! :)

takagi

8:21 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Wrong!

1 Google = 466453

Wireless Google [google.de]

eliasen

10:36 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



good stuff eliasen. well-researched. might G come there for a deal with you someday :)

I wouldn't mind doing some work with them--it would be a good thing for both of us. I'm trying to help scientific literacy with my Frink project ( [futureboy.homeip.net...] ) and they're trying to build a compelling calculator that drives traffic to their site. I do a lot of the stuff that people on this list have been asking for, too, and much more.

I could also help them get more of their answers right... :) I don't know the legal aspects...is there potential liability for Google if they produce wrong numbers, or even worse, wrong units of measurement? (I've seen both of these in their calculator, and I'm a bit worried that people might trust Google's data as authoritative, when they aren't.)

It's sort of sad if unit errors make some kid get their homework wrong--but much sadder to the whole world if otherwise neat satellites like the Mars Climate Orbiter crash because of unit errors...

Duckula

11:03 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Isn't the Golden Mean 0.618033?

The golden mean is Phi = phi + 1 or/and :) Phi = 1/phi, being phi = 0.618033, or Phi = sqrt(5/4) + sqrt(1/4) and phi = sqrt(5/4) - sqrt(1/4). The google result is correct.

[edited by: Duckula at 11:09 am (utc) on Aug. 14, 2003]

wackybrit

11:08 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Grampa Simpson in The Simpsons said, in one episode:

My car gets forty rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it!

Can't seem to do such archaic conversions with Google's calculator just yet.. but hey :-)

eliasen

11:43 am on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Grampa Simpson in The Simpsons said, in one episode:

"My car gets forty rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it!"

Can't seem to do such archaic conversions with Google's calculator just yet.. but hey :-)

Heh heh... well, with Frink ( [futureboy.homeip.net...] ) being named after my favorite Simpsons character, you'd probably assume I can do any conversion referenced in that show:

40 rods / hogshead -> mpg

62500/31499937 (approx. 0.001984130952388889)

Ooh, that's miserable. .0019 mpg? Try it this way:

40 rods / hogshead -> gallons/mile

About 504 gallons per mile! That's worse than the QE2 gets... there's a sample calc in my documentation: ( [futureboy.homeip.net...] ) No wonder Abe had to earn his money on a crooked gameshow. :)

"Fill it up with petroleum distillate and re-vulcanize my tires!" -- C. Montgomery Burns

Netizen

12:12 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



And my simple contribution:

e^-(2*pi*i)

papamaku

12:58 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



it knows a bit of slang

[google.co.uk...]

SlyOldDog

1:19 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey Eliasen - it's against the Webmasterworld TOS to post your URL here even once, let alone in every post.

I tried to ask Google my company's profit this month but it didn¨t know the answer. So there's still some work to do ;)

Seriously though - currency conversion sites had better watch out. How long before I can ask "300 USD in GBP"? This tool has some serious real time applications.

Edit -

How about some other real time stuff? Time in Japan, LIBOR plus 15 basis points, temperature in cairo in fahrenheit?

What a can of worms!

[edited by: SlyOldDog at 1:57 pm (utc) on Aug. 14, 2003]

takagi

1:38 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hi papamaku, what about this one:

1.5 score in roman [google.com]

Giacomo

2:01 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



75 kg in joules:

"75 kilograms = 6.74066384 × 10^18 Joules"

That's my own weight (body mass) in terms of energy (latent heat) calculated using Einstein's equation (E=mc^2).

Too cool! :)

ytswy

2:06 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Definately a cool toy.

One thing that would be actually be quite useful to me would be if it understood what VAT meant - maybe with its value targeted on IP, or just the Google tld.

I have the crappy MacOS calculator, and being able to type a calculation into Google would be handy when a customer is on the phone (Google is quicker than our order system any day of the week, and I swear someone here eats calculators).

It would have to be a special case where + VAT means the same as * VAT, and also ignores usual operator precedence and do this calculation after all operations left of itself.

Hollywood

2:46 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Not bad they can handle huge cals fast!

----------------

5 + (2 * 2 * 2 * 33 445 566 * 1 000 * 3 456 789) = 9.24914117 × 10 (to the) 17 (power)
More about calculator.

Search for documents containing the terms 5+2*2*2*33445566*1000*3456789.

SlyOldDog

2:55 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hmmm yes, the largest number it can handle is

1.7976* 10 to the power 308

I wonder why? I thought the Googol was the largest imaginable number?

tomkee

6:26 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A bug! It ignore my simple request 1/0 :-)

DarkFriend

6:54 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Too cool! I can search and do math at the same time! Next, Google will make fries too!

doc_z

8:33 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Nice tool, even if the result of 0^0 is incorrect.

Perhaps :-( would be the better anwser.

Chndru

10:25 pm on Aug 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



hmmm 0^0 is one, as google shows. some may argue that 0^0 is indeterminate. An interesting discussion is on [mathforum.org...]

MonkeeSage

12:34 am on Aug 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



a / b = c === c * b = a

So...

0 / 0 = 1 === 1 * 0 = 0

or:

0 / 0 = 0 === 0 * 0 = 0

or:

0 / 0 = 18798728972 === 18798728972 * 0 = 0

Doh!

In fact, any number (ad infinitum) supplied as the answer to 0 / 0, will always fit the pattern...thus the answer is undefinied, or else numerical identity is compromised.

Jordan

Allergic

2:26 am on Aug 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Not working very well:
How much kilowatts/hour for a major blackout! ;-)

g1smd

12:34 pm on Aug 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



A site I am associated with is listed in many business directories. I recently noticed that some of them had an incorrect digit in the published telephone number. I used Google to search for that number and am confident that I found most of them, if not all.

I just tried the same search in [alltheweb.com...] using a number in the format 01234 567890 and got an illegal operator message and it further said to use only + - * / = instead. Putting the number in "quotes" allowed me to do the search that I wanted.

How long has alltheweb had a calculator in it? Doesn't look as if it is as powerful as the google one though.

Herenvardo

5:04 pm on Aug 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



SlyOldDog:
As any programmer knows (like me :)), all numbers are managed in a computer as a sequence of bits. This sequences can only be interpreted as integer numbers, but you can get a sequence of bits in a format like this:
SMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEE
This would mean that the first bit is taken as sign, the M bits are the significative digits and the E bits are the exponent, like in the scientific notation, but using base 2 instead of 10, so M+2^E.
If you use 64bit floating point arithmetic, as is used almost always, you will have bits enough to represent numbers greaters than a googol. These numbers can be unexistent, greater than any countable thing, etc; but they can be represented. And if you give an expression big enough, like 150! (150x149x148...x4x3x2x1), the answer will be represented by this unexisting numbers.

In conclusion: these numbers exist in maths and calculators, but in real live they might be the answer to nothing.

Regards,
Herenvardö

g1smd

10:49 pm on Aug 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>> In conclusion: these numbers exist in maths and calculators, but in real live they might be the answer to nothing. <<

I would think that the number of atoms in the Universe is an extremely large (almost infinite by human comprehension), but still finite, number.

SlyOldDog

11:40 pm on Aug 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes - just wondering why the limit is what it is. Is it 2^something?

SlyOldDog

11:46 pm on Aug 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes - it's 2^1023.999999999999

What a useless piece of information!

caine

11:55 pm on Aug 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



no answer to my query:

becuase :- litmus test for any NLP/AI processing agent.

doc_z

7:43 am on Aug 20, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I would think that the number of atoms in the Universe is an extremely large (almost infinite by human comprehension), but still finite, number.

Even this number is very small compared to the limits of the calculator.

Although, I haven't the time so far to recount this number by hand.

Herenvardo

3:16 pm on Aug 20, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



SlyOldDog
If you have not enough with 2^1024, then you need some tool more specific than the calculator of a Web Search Engine!
Even so, there are tools that can manage numbers as big as you want, breaking the number in many numeric variables and managing them as a whole. Normally, they are able to use all the available RAM in a PC to store only one number, so it can become much greater.
Supposing a PC with total memory 128MB. If there is only opoen the OS and the calculation program, is very probably that there will be 64MB of free ram. If this is used to store only one number, how big can it be?
I challenge you to find it out!:) I will post the answer tomorrow.

g1smd:
I've found this for you:
[pages.prodigy.net ]
Number of atoms in the universe even less than a googol.

Greetings,
Herenvardö

geoapa

8:48 pm on Aug 20, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



2*pi*radius = Circumference.

so,
2 * pi * radius of earth in miles
= 24,901.3164 miles... the circumference of the earth.

So dividing the circumference by 24 would result in the earth's Miles per Hour which is 1,037.5585 MPH.

If someone travels at this speed (around the earth's equator) opposite the earth's rotation the sun shouldn't move; correct?

What if they travel faster? would they be going back in time?

woah.. google and webmasterworld got my gears turning..

Where's Marty McFly when you need him?

This 122 message thread spans 5 pages: 122