Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Is Google now just doing a continuous, rolling update?

I believe so.

         

rfgdxm1

2:39 am on Jun 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Given what is still going on now with the datacenters, I am going to propose the theory that Google has shifted from monthly updates to minor updates every day or 2. This is why Esmeralda seems to have no end. Esmeralda was the beginning of a brave new era of the constant update. Of course I might be wrong and just end up with egg all over my face after this post. ;)

I also notice it seems that Google has 2 banks of datacenters. Only one of the 2 does the partial update. Next partial update, the other bank of datacenters is used. Looks to me like -ex, -in, and -zu are involved this time. And, possibly -va. However, it could be that all of these are being rerouted all to one physical datacenter. Looking at traceroutes this may be the case.

Beachboy

2:50 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Re: www-fi

I am not seeing any big change here from what I see right now on www3 for kw terms I follow. Some minor shifting of positioning, yes. The spam I see on www3 I also see on fi.

Net_Wizard

5:27 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)



I don't know about -fi but I'm puzzled that a popular site was nowhere to be found on its important key words from -fi and ranking pretty good at other data center. I checked the source code of the cache version and the source code from the site itself. It's exactly the same, no tricks, no JS, yet it's not at -fi where it is suppose to be in terms of ranking.

Do you guys have also notice the slight difference in adwords result between data centers?

Estimated Google index

ex - 1,950,000,000
in - 2,250,000,000
cw - 2,240,000,000
dc - 2,240,000,000
fi - 2,230,000,000
va - 2,230,000,000
sj - 2,240,000,000
ab - 2,240,000,000
zu - 2,240,000,000

Dolemite

7:06 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



fi has moved to ww2 and 3. Looks like this is winding down.

www2 and 3 have had their DNS pointing at fi for a couple days now.

vdlddd8379

7:30 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm seeing new results now matching for four datacenters (-ab, -zu, -sj and -fi). Who knows if any of this will stick for more than a few minutes. It's anyone's guess. There are still a lot of irrelevant results in the top 10 on these datacenters (i.e., sites in foreign languages, sites without the keyword anywhere to be found on the page, amateur sites with embarrassingly lame content, etc.). Hold on to your hats and stay tuned...

mipapage

9:43 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google may, in fact, be moving to a rolling update - I figure this is probable because GoogleGuy himself has hinted that this is the future, and that 'updates' as we know them may be on their way out.

One thing I have noticed is that the people in this thread have been talking a lot about the changes in the DC's yet I've seen very few mentions of the GoogleBots.

I would imagine that some observations of bot behavior tied in with tangible results in the Serps would support the theory proposed by rfgdxm1, rather than watching just the dc's (which we all know by GG's comments are under flux for the period of the Esmerelda update and some time shortly thereafter).

WRT the bots, while there are some fresh-dates out there, there seems to be - in my neighborhood - less of them. To support this I have seen less GBot traffic on our sites and our main site in particular.

The observation wrt our main site may be a bit skewed, as a redesign went up this weekend, and it could be that GBot doesn't like it, as all other bot traffic is up, but Gbot is down, but it could also be that they are trying to balance the polishing of Esmerelda with getting new data into the results.

My 2cents, fwiw!

guddu

9:57 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



According to my personal experience, Google now just doing a continuous, rolling update.

In May, it crawled and updated for all over the month and similar thing is happening once again in June. Also, according to googleguy, freshbot is behaving like deepbot. So, many sites are been crawled and updated every 2-3 days.

As far as I have noticed, this depends on the links to the website from the relevant sites and not the page rank of the site. If you get links from websites that are top rated by google such as different directories, universities, microsoft, etc., or yours is a news site, your website have more chances to be crawled and update on a monthly basis.

I have a website that has only 3 links from universities, dmoz.org, google directory and is being updated every week.

Similary another that has many links but not all relevant to that business, is updated 1-2 a week.

So, I agree with the statement "Google now just doing a continuous, rolling update."

mipapage

11:20 am on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



next anomoly noted is that the fresh cache copies of some index pages are gone and replaced with old (month ago) pages

Yep, I see this too. We haven't been crawled lately, but there was a relatively-fresh version of our index page up before the recent round of f-tags (jun-24).

Anyway, I wouldn't call this an anomaly, I've seen this behavior on Google long before any of the recent changes started taking place.

<snip>I saw the light</snip>

Marval

12:07 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Doing a quick check of my logs, after noting that I was missing fresh results although returned to my original position in the SERPs, both Fresh and Deep bots were at my site last night...from 64. and 216.
Each requested and got my index page 5 times in a row, with no errors and then left? weird behaviour

whoz2

12:09 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have a site that was banned back in November, now shows a PR4 for the home page and several other pages deeper in the site. No inbound links and no pages in the index. This is wierd, I'd like to think its a good sign but... Googles acting so goofy who knows. Last week the site had no PR but had 496 inbound and showed alexa's review as allinurl

Chris_D

12:42 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think that the datacentres are still testing lots of filters. I get to look at literally hundreds of sites - across many market sectors - its the nature of what I do.

You guys need to get out a little more. As Lou Reed said 'take a walk on the wild side...'

I'm not an "adult webmaster" - far far from it. But while you guys focus on 'blue widgets;' and 'neat widgets' - you potentially miss the real issues. The real action is on the darker side of what people want to sell.

Try canadian betting in www-fi

234,00 results - I'd say that's reasonably competitive - so read the 'keywords in context snippets'.

Try disney cartoons in www-fi and look at number 10 - the nude ones.

Try a search on long tongue on www-fi or www-in

Hmmm.

How spammy is that? Hasta la vista late 1990's.? Top 10 results are absolutely pathetic - any searcher should be appalled. Search for betting - you get pop up porno. Look at the url for result 3 for long tongue - great URL! And I've now locked my PC - if google isn't dafe for searches for Disney cartoons - then the internet - or Google - have lost the plot. Lost it.

I said yesterday that -fi apparently had no spam filtering applied - whereas www-in did. I take that back.

Clearly - its all crap. All of it. Whats an adult filter?

Hasta la vista google?

takagi

12:53 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



yahoo and google are switching data between the first group of datacenters (fi, dc, va, ab) and second group of datacenters ex, cw, in for last two days or so. aol is just showing data from first group. sj and zu are redirected to other data centers.

The most recent and best updated centers, IMO, are "in, ex, & cw"

This may be a stupid question, but are these datacenters geo sensitive?

If the information here [webmasterworld.com] is correct, then the data centers 'in, ex, & cw' are in California (sj is also but redirected) the home state of Google. The data centers 'dc, va, & ab' are outside California (and so is zu, but that one is also redirected) and fi is somewhere in America. So it could very well be geo sensitive.

Dolemite

1:04 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Unless you have safesearch on, I'm not sure why disney cartoons shouldn't return what it does. I'm sure there are more than a few people looking to see Snow White filled out like an application. Who should decide whether they do?

Its not up to google to censor the internet (thankfully). They do censor sites from their results in some cases, but I don't agree with it in any case. Just taking on the charge assumes some responsibility for what's displayed for a given query, and exposes google to some level of risk.

Actually the site in question is quite spammy as far as doorway pages and that sort of thing, so if that's what you were referring to, I agree, the spam filters should catch that.

rfgdxm1

1:19 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>Unless you have safesearch on, I'm not sure why disney cartoons shouldn't return what it does. I'm sure there are more than a few people looking to see Snow White filled out like an application. Who should decide whether they do?

For those who are unfamiliar, there is a significant amount of porn out there that involves Disney characters. These porn sites coming up on a search for Disney cartoons are indeed relevant.

Chris_D

1:45 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



spammy as far as doorway pages and that sort of thing, so if that's what you were referring to, I agree, the spam filters should catch that

Yep - thats it. Just forget Disney - sorry I mislead you - of course thats a relevent result. As I said - hundreds of serps - sometimes I just get confused.

So forget Disney - just look at canadian betting - and try the keywords in context and the cache! Sometimes - you just can't cache good spam!

Absolutely relavent results. Nah - Googles not broken. Its better than ever.

: )

mfishy

2:01 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Things have, once again gone totally awry.

It seemed as though the index was shaping up on fi/cw/in. Now it is reverting back to dominic?

We have been calling it "One to None"- referring to pages that go from #1 on many of the datacenters to off the map the next day.

If this does settle down like the "traditional update" GoogleGuy said we were going to have, I liken it to musical chairs.

When the music stops you better hope it is on an hour where your site is listed.

Namaste

2:06 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



From what I have seen, there is a PARTIAL CONTINUOUS update taking place:
1. There is now only one bot: it is crawling fresh & deep: it does certain pages everyday, but it does very deep pages only on certain days
2. Pages already in the index are being updated every contnuously and a lot more "off page" factors are being considered. I have been seeing pages that are in the index moving up and down a bit, but no new deep-page has been added. Pages I add with links from the homepage are added immediately, but deep pages are not being added...this is the same a before.

I thus think the only "new" thing happening is that we're seeing more off-page factors considered fresh; and one bot name

rfgdxm1

2:14 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>It seemed as though the index was shaping up on fi/cw/in. Now it is reverting back to dominic?

As of the moment I am writing this, I still see the good results on those datacenters. I wouldn't be surprised if this doesn't last, though.

>If this does settle down like the "traditional update" GoogleGuy said we were going to have, I liken it to musical chairs.

I'm wondering if this will settle, or things will just keep eratically switching? At the moment, if you don't like the Google SERPs, wait a few hours and see what they are like then.

Stefan

2:28 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't know if this helps...

A new page, put up on the 18th was crawled about the 21st, appeared in yesterdays SERPs on all dc's, with no freshtag, then today is gone on all dc's.

It was #1 for the <title> kw1 kw2, so very cool, but it was a very brief stay in the serps for a freshbot hit... I'd usually expect 2-3 days.

I haven't seen 64.68 at all the last 2 days. I'd like to see this update truly over then find out what kind of stuff deepfreshbot has.

Dolemite

2:29 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It seemed as though the index was shaping up on fi/cw/in. Now it is reverting back to dominic?

Yep...fi is back to Demonic for my SERPs.

1. There is now only one bot: it is crawling fresh & deep: it does certain pages everyday, but it does very deep pages only on certain days
2. Pages already in the index are being updated every contnuously and a lot more "off page" factors are being considered. I have been seeing pages that are in the index moving up and down a bit, but no new deep-page has been added. Pages I add with links from the homepage are added immediately, but deep pages are not being added...this is the same a before.

I can't get new pages spidered past the homepage for a brand new site of mine. I keep getting new links to it, but still none of that deep action. I'm just about down to actually submitting those pages...

marcusmiller

3:21 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Im in a similar position:

newish site, 3 months old. index page spans to 10 or so category pages which span to 150 or so product pages. The product pages were crawled and indexed about 2.5 months ago but were only about 10 then, since they have dropped out and all of the new ones have not been indexed and the googlebot is just not going that deep into my site to index them. I even tried adding links to a few of these on the homepage but it will not follow links to my product pages.

A deep crawl, a deep crawl my kingdom for a deep crawl.

When will this madness end, this has to be the worst time to launch a site in the last 3 years.

JBoss008

3:40 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am not sure which data center Yahoo uses, but you can sit and keep refreshing and get totally different SERP's each time.

Good thing I am not a gambling man or this would seem a lot like slots. Clicking is just putting your quarter in and seeing what will come up.

Kind of cool...I guess :)

Marval

4:07 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



rfgdxm1 got to ask (or anyone else thats seeing the index flux effect), what type of bot activity are you seeing in your logs? Are you seeing repetitive attempts from the same bot, is it the ole 216 deepbot or the new freshdeepbot at 64.? Just a theory Im running down and would like to analyze this a little deeper (mods if you want a separate thread ok by me)

batdesign

4:36 pm on Jun 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Seeing a fresh date tag of 24th of June on one of my sites internal pages, yet it's displayed using months old meta description. Anyone else seen this?

twilight47

2:43 am on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Back down to 2 indexes
-cw -in -ex, the odd men out again, 4 against 3.

"Rock & Roll" updates,
Rock = Depends on Which data center www is pulling it's index.
Roll = New indexes coming through the data centers in waves.
I could get used to that. :)

rfgdxm1

2:54 am on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yep, looks like -ab and -va have got with the program. Not that the -fi index doesn't have some problems, but it is the best Google's got at the moment.

annej

3:43 am on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



porkchop, Pretty much everyone has experienced Google serps flitting back and forth between old info and new. It's frustrating but I guess we just have to give Google time. They appear to be trying out a number of different things, hopefully it will sort out soon.

djgreg

6:20 am on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



For my keywords fi is still better that www. I can't see any changes since yesterday, except the fresh tags which are now the 25th of June, yesterday they were 24.

djgreg

1:27 pm on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



rfgdxm1, for example the ongoing nr1 positions for really bad guestbook spammers.
I know I am coming back to this issue often, but I do not understand why not changing the algo not to count those rubbishy backlinks which give nr1 positions to sites which are not worth a nr100 position.
frustrating!

mfishy

1:31 pm on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



DC and Sj seem to be veering in another direction now as well.

Assuming this is the "traditional" update that GG alluded to, this period is taking so long that the temporary/flux results are becoming quite important. 10 days so far and no end in sight.

If updates take half the month, the dance becomes as relevant as the final results. The saying "Wait till the dust settles" is outdated.

Also, Google has been known to apply spam filters towards the end of an update. If this is still the case, one may be able to gather quite a lot of traffic before the hammer falls now.

HayMeadows

2:16 pm on Jun 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Assuming this is the "traditional" update that GG alluded to, this period is taking so long that the temporary/flux results are becoming quite important. 10 days so far and no end in sight.

My thinking exactly. Its FAST becoming a new game, anyone's game. Write that one in INK.

This 216 message thread spans 8 pages: 216