Forum Moderators: open
Run the code through [validator.w3.org...] but make sure you tick the boxes for "Show Source" and "Verbose Output", but especially tick the box for "Show Outline" as well.
On the results page, scroll down through the error list (if there is one) and look for the section marked "Document Outline". If the list there does not look like a summary of your document then you are abusing the tag.
By the way, [webmasterworld.com...] someone asked the same question just 42 minutes earlier.
Only yesterday I came across a site that was ranked no 10 purely on PR and alt tags (front page was 95% images), and this was for a 2,500,000 results search term. No keyword anchor text, no keyword url text and the keyword was also separated in the title!
Fact is we can never know exactly what the flavour of the month is going to be, but it sure looks like all the above can make a significant difference.
Now my main worry is I am at postion 14 for the last 15 days for a particular keyword like widget store online .I have title has widget store online at...... and h1 as "store widget online".
Will the change in h1 will push me into top 10.?Is the mirror image so effective?
Please clarify?
Aravind
....
<body>
<h1>Here is my Title</h1>
Tha't s what I mean. If you can't fit it all in, it's not the end of the world, but an <h1> tag was designed specifically for the title of a page so it should, where possible, mirror the <title> tag.
You can always <br /> an <h1> if you need to....
Nick
And: Don't overdo one factor. Not knowing the optimum for a given time there is still a lot of place right and left of the optimum to allow you to get ranking among the first 10. (Only for the fiercly competitive keywords this will not be sufficient. There it helps to look for approprate 2- and even 3-keyword combinations to find your niche.)
>><h1> tag was designed specifically for the title of a page so it should, where possible, mirror the <title> tag
Would you mind sharing with us the source of the above assertion?
The w3.org section relative to the tag suggests otherwise and contradicts the above.
source [w3.org]
A heading element briefly describes the topic of the section it introduces. Heading information may be used by user agents, for example, to construct a table of contents for a document automatically.There are six levels of headings in HTML with H1 as the most important and H6 as the least. Visual browsers usually render more important headings in larger fonts than less important ones.
I do agree that where appropriate (for seo purposes) it is a good idea to establish a relationship between the <title> and <h1> tags.
Nick_W>><h1> tag was designed specifically for the title of a page so it should, where possible, mirror the <title> tag
Would you mind sharing with us the source of the above assertion?
Well, I'm sure you didn't mean to sound quite so belligerant ;) so I went and had a scout around for you as I know this to be true:
Try this:
[w3.org...]
Nick
Inbound link text: 10 points.
title: 10 points
domain name: 7 points
large h1-h2 headings: 5 points
first sentence of first paragraph 5 points
path or filename: 4 points
proximity (multi kws): 4
beginning of a sentence 1.5 points
bold or italic text: 1 points
usage in text: 1 point
title attribute: 1 point
alt tag: .5 point
meta descrip: .5 points
meta keywords: .05 point
>>large h1-h2 headings
That's clearly out of date (se's don't currently see the 'size' of tags unless you use pre-historic html3.2) but it's worth repeating (as you did ;)) as it's still IMO a good indication of where stuff lies.
I'm not an SEO, but I pay attention and from what I see that's a pretty good summation. Even several years on....
Nick
large h1-h2 headings: 5 points
first sentence of first paragraph 5 points
path or filename: 4 points
proximity (multi kws): 4
beginning of a sentence 1.5 points
bold or italic text: 1 points