Forum Moderators: open
I would imagine that the Google people hand-picked a number of sample "ideal" pages and ran the keyword counter on them to determine the "sweet spot" for keyword density. If your page's density was too much higher or lower than this sweet spot, it would get little or no advantage. If Google did things this way, I have to imagine that keyword density would be a non-trivial method of determining a page's rank. Pure speculation on my part, though.
"keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3 keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3 keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3 keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3 keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3 keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3 keyword 1 keyword 2 keyword 3"
I'm hoping they finally got around this problem and google can now perform some sort of filter on either blocks of keyword text out of context on a page, or can check the colour of a background graphic image.
If you remember, this was discussed at length back in April before even the deepcrawl started and anyone knew of what was to become of Dominic.
I wonder if they listened?
TJ
Wrong method
destination in india, destination nepal, destination in sri lanka, destination in singapore
Correct Method
destination india, nepal, sri lanka, singapore
On a complex gif that would be very very difficult.
I agree on writing style though - repetitive use like this should qualify for a penalty.
We'll see what they come up with.
TJ
I have a listing of links to sub pages like this:
Restaurants
Hotels
Accomodation
Travel
...
My problem is I rank high on all these and get tons of useless trafic beecause the pages are localised to one country.
but writing
Restaurants in country
Hotels in country
Accomodation in country
Travel in country
...
Is spammy and nonsensical to visitors. But it would give google the idea of what the pages are about (i.e. rank the pages high for "Restaurants Country" and lower for "restaurants")
could I use:
Restaurants <span style:display:none">in country</span>
Hotels <span style:display:none">in country</span>
Accomodation <span style:display:none">in country</span>
Travel <span style:display:none">in country</span>
in this case?
SN
Algo's will change (and the "correct" percentages may change), but the English language has rules which have survived hundreds of years and more.
The ultimate goal of an algo for keyword density will be to scan text in the same way that a human reads it.
Build for humans and let the robots catch up.
And make sure it's in the title, headings and URL.
TJ
Algo's will change (and the "correct" percentages may change), but the English language has rules which have survived hundreds of years and more.
True, and probably algos will catch up in a few years but but I want to design for today and Google's website is my guiding light for (high) keyword density. ;)
My take is this:
1. Design your site for the User
2. Design according to rules set out by W3.org and RFC 952.
Then,you will be fine today AND tomorrow.
Best,
Roland
However, we have the ability to change our pages and we should be optimizing for current SEs. My opinion is that first write it from the visitor's point of view (that is in normal plain English) and then add a few keywords here and there, especially in the title, and headings to make it better for the search.
I don't do kw density anymore. Just because a highly ranked page has density doesn't mean it's there because of the density- Examine those pages closer, there are other factors pushing those pages up.
I concentrate on the other factors and do very well.
Page titles, headings, anchortext etc are all more important variables in the algo's and you only have to do it once.
Rather than re-writing your sites pages once a month, you would do much better to spend that time adding new pages every month.
TJ