Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.160.221.82

Forum Moderators: buckworks & webwork

Message Too Old, No Replies

.mobi

Approved by Icann yesterday

     
5:31 pm on Jul 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 26, 2002
posts:402
votes: 0


Icann approves .mobi domain extension [vnunet.com]

Super glad to see the 90 day honeymoon period.

9:43 am on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 23, 2001
posts:843
votes: 0


sorry, complete waste of an ext IMHO...
4:51 pm on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 26, 2002
posts:402
votes: 0


Care to elaborate Hunter?
8:18 pm on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 23, 2001
posts:843
votes: 0


Sure Quinn,
They are trying to create a need that does not exist. Sites can be optimized to appear properly on mobile devices without the use of another ext. There is no need, just the desire to market another domain product, an ugly and awkward product at that. People can just as easily type .com into a mobile device (and would be more inclined to) than .mobi
8:30 pm on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 26, 2002
posts:402
votes: 0


There is no need, just the desire to market another domain product

I'd already given up resisting that trend.

:)

ugly and awkward

agreed.

easily type .com into a mobile device

agreed.

Nevertheless....there will be opportunity there. A plausible reason for its existence is all that's nescessary.

8:42 pm on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 22, 2002
posts:1001
votes: 0


Question - if it's a domain name from mobile devices (ie phones), then why a) make the domain name longer and b) use characters from the same key, which means you have to wait the 3 seconds until your phone lets you start the "o"?

D'oh!

10:01 pm on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 27, 2001
posts:762
votes: 0


It does seem kind of silly to me. Perhaps I haven't hit my head hard enough with a brick yet...
10:17 pm on July 13, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 24, 2004
posts:117
votes: 0


Hi

I can understand peoples view if they are looking at it from a .com, .net, .org point of view.

This is different from just releasing a new top level domain.

The difference is that to use a .mobi address you will have to abide by a style guideline. This will ensure that anyone people viewing it on a mobile phone will see the site correctly.

Whether this works in practice remains to be seen :)

dregs33

9:42 am on July 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 21, 2003
posts:824
votes: 0


All .mobi sites will have to display at lower resolutions, at the moment often what happens is the phone downloads all the extra stuff and throws it away, which is expensive when users are paying by data volume.

Whether .mobi is implicit or not, users will know that all .mobi sites will work well with their phones.

If the browsers on phones do default to .mobi (as browsers on desktops sometimes default to .com) this will give .mobi instant typeins as well.