When I logged into my management account to order the domain, their system used my existing info to fill the fields. The instructions specifically said that member information could be edited later from within the management interface, so instead of entering my friend's info then and there I completed the registration with my info in all fields, intending to update everything within a few minutes.
Moments later, their system let me correct everything I needed to change ... except for the Registrant Name. I could update the address, phone, admin email, everything except for changing my name to my friend's company name.
I phoned the registrar's support to ask them to update it for me, since their system wasn't working as promised. I expected that one quick phone call would result in common-sense action and the correction I needed; no big deal.
But they refused, pointing to an obscure sentence in the registrant agreement that said the registrant name could only be changed if [a whole bunch of identifying information] was faxed to them. They said they had to do that to avoid legal risks. The procedure they were demanding was very different from what they had said at the point where the fields were to be filled in!
They stuck by the small print instead of the big print. I had to fill out and fax the form they sent, a major inconvenience during holiday travels! If the domain had been registered for a while I would not have considered that unreasonable, but in the circumstances I thought it was simply stupid.
Considering that ...
(1) this was a brand new registration;
(2) I had the passwords for both the domain itself and the multiple-domain management account it was under;
(3) the update I was requesting was an exact match for the company name on the credit card that had paid for the domain just moments before;
(4) the relationship between the company name and the domain name was clear, and
(5) the supervisor admitted that some of the instructions I had trusted during the registration process were not accurately written;
... was it reasonable or unreasonable for me to think that they should have made the correction I needed, without any hassle?
I accept the need for fraud precautions, but in my mind it shows a serious lack of common sense to enforce the whole procedure on a minutes-old domain when it was their own sloppy editing that led to the situation.
I have to wonder what sort of "protection" a fax would provide in the event of a fraudulent transfer attempt. A fax would be easier to forge than the information I had already given them.