Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168
Forum Moderators: phranque
It has always seemed quite possible to me that .shtml would be treated as more of a suspect than other extensions, but I've never really taken the time to do any definitive testing.
>>I was wondering if anyone else has noticed a change in the amount of shtml pages showing up
I haven't noticed any changes, but I'm curious what type of change you have seen. More or less?
I haven't really noticed much at all. I seem to have come across a few more dynamic extensions (shtml, cgi etc) but not enough that I'm willing to go with it yet. Gonna stick with .html for the time being.
Also, I have noticed the difference in ranking. Most (almost all) good ranked web site for competitive keywords are with .html or .htm extensions.