Forum Moderators: buckworks

Message Too Old, No Replies

Why did Webvan Crash?

         

Westat1

4:02 pm on Jun 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I was reading a case study on Webvan, and while it briefly covered it's demise it didn't give any solid reasons why. Everybody needs to eat, so it wasn't the industry. Some people would like the delivery... Any ideas?

jimbeetle

4:33 pm on Jun 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Probably a few factors taken together, most notably the incredible run-up in net-related stocks that led to huge spending without corresponding income. And pile on inflated 'market cap' estimates which enouraged companies to take on more and more debt ("Hey, these guys are in the same business as you and their debt ratio is 260 to 1. We can get you another $687 billion in loans!") just encouraged writing more checks.

I seen to remember that Webvan made -- or started to make -- very big investments in new hi-tech warehouses and a delivery fleet that ate up a lot of cash.

And, while most users were happy with the service, well, there just weren't enough users to sustain it or justify what was being spent.

hooloovoo22

5:02 pm on Jun 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



yea. i was one of those happy users. sad to see it go.

I think it's an idea that was ahead of its' time. They tried to build too much too fast. 13 huge automated distribution centers across the us and the one in san fran was just starting to work.

I think the industry was so small margin and price sensitive that it was hard to break in. It is not that inconvenient for people to go to a grocery store since they're all over the place. They didn't offer the average person a real good reason to switch, and with such small margin products they needed new customers to jump in with both feet.

who knows...maybe amazon or walmart will do this the right way. peapod is still around here in chicago. I expect to see the business model come up again when tech gets a second wind.

another thing to look at...their ceo, Shaheen - former anderson consulting - made out like a bandit and seemed a tad shady.

pbreit

5:39 pm on Jun 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Horrible execution.

They expanded rapidly despite never proving viability in a single market. They also didn't appear to make adjustments that may have facilitated viability (e.g., wider delivery windows, high margin items, etc.).

jsinger

7:55 pm on Jun 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey, it worked just great for the insiders who unloaded their stock early.