Forum Moderators: buckworks
- many banner graphics are poorly designed. They are easy to ignore and there is often no visual feedback that the image is an actionable element (i.e. something that can be clicked on). On an old site I worked on, clickthrough on banner ads improved not insignificantly (15%) when we simply added the words "click here" to the banner
- people have been "trained" to ignore graphic banner ads but assume that text links are content links. Thus, users are increasingly unlikely to comprehend, much less click on, images, whereas less inhibition yet exists for text links.
- on the flip side from the "overlooked" banner ad is the "overbearing" banner ad. Blinking, flashing, Las Vegas-style advertising is, for me, an indicator of some sort of sleaze-- I click the back button instinctively. No such reaction would occur with a text link (provided it's not <blink>ing).
- some people browse with graphics turned off and may not see graphical banner ads. Also, text links are more compact perhaps meaning more of them will be loaded before the user browses away from the page.