Forum Moderators: buckworks

Message Too Old, No Replies

Getting health insurance (U.S.)

Dilemma of being self-employed and getting coverage

         

timmus

6:38 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Considering most of us are self-employed and not under any group rate, how do we get any decent health coverage plan?

When I was in Oklahoma I looked at the group coverage offered by the National Association for the Self Employed. They sent out a nice agent (middleman?) but the policy had more holes than a sieve and we declined. I was in the military for 9 years and found coverage for awhile through USAA at $330/mo for the family, but USAA does not offer this anymore.

I'm in Texas and had one visit to the ER last month, which cost $2300 for a 45-minute visit for chest pain that turned out to be nothing. Yes, Canada is looking awfully promising, but if there's any U.S. state that is addressing this issue at all it would make more sense to go there.

epfantasia

6:48 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've just moved back Stateside from the UK and have had to do the same. Ended up going with Blue Cross/Blue Shield, for no other reason than the fact that they are available nationwide and are a fairly trusted name. I was quoted an individual cover of ~$430/month (prescription cover plan) or ~$300 (non-prescription).

rfontaine

7:14 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The powers that be do not want a national health care plan because without one most people are forced to continue to work for corporations. This limits the competition too, since fewer people feel they can risk going out and starting their own businesses (which would help the nations economy tremendously in the long run with innovation etc etc/).

It is a sad sad fact that America is run by large corporations who grease the palms of our elected officials.

hannamyluv

8:06 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Here in Cleveland, there are several companies who have started offering individual plans at surprisingly affordable rates and the coverage is comperable to when I had a plan with the last company I worked for. They are mostly HMOs, but I have never had a problem if I had to go outside the system. I am currently with Kaiser.

Take a look around and call a few of your local insurance companies to see if they offer individual plans in your area. Many insurance companies are starting to find that they can make a profit from offering affordable health insurance on a one on one basis.

DryFire

8:58 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google: “Health Savings Account”
We did quite a bit of research on the subject and from what we found a Health Savings Account is by far the best option for health insurance for the self employed. Just make sure that you go with someone who understands the program since it is relatively new. In addition to saving on your health insurance… there is a nice tax benefit.

Side note: One of the main reasons that health insurance costs continue to rise is because most employees essentially have a blank check and they act like it. Health care providers also realize that their patients don’t care what it costs since their employers / insurance companies are paying for it. Essentially there are hardly any market forces to keep costs in control. (Socialized health care only makes the problem worse btw).

I believe that eventually it will get to the point that employers refuse to pay for employee healthcare and at that point costs will start to come down as the blank check is removed and employees start to care about the actual value (benefit / cost) of the healthcare they receive.

Litigation is also out of control… but that is another topic and I have already ranted enough.

keno

9:30 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Look around at some medical insurance brokers. You may get referrals from your local chamber of commerce.

I found brokers offer pretty much the same thing. Blue Cross or Humana were the main ones - in Colorado.

Low cost equals high deductibles, but in some cases you can offset the high deductible policy with an accident policy that costs $40-50 per month.

I think Oregon was looking into health insurance coverage a while back, but they already have budget problems...

Canada seems to have its good points alright...

4crests

9:48 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The "Health Savings Account" is the best deal, as mentioned above.

We are going to be switching to one shortly.

That said, we have been with the National Association of Self Employed for 3 years now.

We have been totally happy with them. We have never had them try to deny a claim or anything like that. We have the MAJOR MEDICAL policy and we added the ACCIDENT policy, which covers broken legs, etc. etc.

The Major Medical covers Cancer, and major hospital stays, stuff like that. Really in the past 3 years the only thing we have had to pay 100% for is routine doctor visits. But even those have been lower because NASE gets you a better rate. My wife sprained her ankle badly, and my daughter broke her leg. Both were covered just fine. We paid 20% of the bill, but it really comes to about 10% since they get the better rate for you than if you had no insurance at all. I wouldn't hesitate to use them.

But, the savings account is the better way to go. Unless you get unlucky and come down with cancer right away, it will easily save you money over the long run.

DryFire

10:21 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



People who tout Canada’s “free?” health care system haven’t looked at Canada’s tax rates. – sorry I went a bit off topic.

keno

10:49 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So can you tell us what the base tax rates are in Canada?

DryFire

11:24 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Here is a link to an article on the subject:
[readersdigest.ca...]

Granted Reader’s Digest isn’t the Wall Street Journal, but the stats that they list are probably pretty reputable. Looks like the average tax burden for a Canadian citizen is 48.2% which is 14% higher than in the US.

Conard

11:49 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The "Health Savings Account" is the best deal, as mentioned above.

An HSA gets my vote too. We picked up a low cost major medical plan through Aetna for around $130 a month.

Beagle

11:53 pm on Dec 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Side note: One of the main reasons that health insurance costs continue to rise is because most employees essentially have a blank check and they act like it.

That's becoming less and less true all the time - Most employers can't afford the rates for that kind of coverage. I work for a University that runs its own hospital. Ten years ago, employee insurance covered 100% of your costs if you used their hospital, but those days are long gone because they can't afford to "give away" services anymore. Now it's high deductibles, co-pays, and then 80/20. There aren't many complaints, because it's still better coverage than you'd get with most employers.

--Check out Hawaii. Although times may have changed there, too, they used to be the state with the best healthcare plan.

--As has already been mentioned, if there's a trade organization you're eligible for that has a group plan (and the dues aren't too high), that can sometimes be an answer.

choster

12:03 am on Dec 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Joining a professional associations in an industry with many independent/freelance workers may afford you some discounts, e.g. [aiga.org...] .

buckworks

12:04 am on Dec 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Looks like the average tax burden for a Canadian citizen is 48.2% which is 14% higher than in the US.

Make sure you're comparing apples to apples. To make anywhere near a fair comparison you'd need to compare Canada's taxes to US taxes PLUS the burden of health and insurance costs which are paid by the individual.

keno

12:15 am on Dec 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



DryFire – (Hopefully the math is correct!)

Canadian Rate 48.2%
Difference per article 14%
USA Tax Rate 42%

I would go along with that – looks right on the money to me.

Canadian healthcare costs are somewhat included in their tax payments. I say “somewhat” because honestly I can’t vouch for the quality or quantity of their healthcare.

From previous posts we see that folks are quoted $300-400 per month for family healthcare. I pay around the same – or a little more. This comes to $5000 per year.

The difference in rate above is 6%. If I make $83,000 per year, which is way above average US income, and pay $5000 in health insurance costs the 6% becomes a wash. (There are tax breaks involved - let’s keep it simple)

There are other considerations that are more important to me than the cost per month.

Have you gone through the process of buying private health care in the USA for you and your family?

I have, and because my wife has a little pin in her knee due to a (karate) injury, no healthcare company that I know of will cover that knee again. After all they are profit driven companies that provide health care here.

When my friend’s husband died of lung cancer, the company insurance ran out while he was in hospital. He was evicted from the hospital and died a few days later at home – the hospital helped because they evacuated fluid from his lungs. But when he got home things got tougher.

The old and sick and infirm are all hidden in this country. We only hear about the success, the money, and fame. One of the largest demographics for bankruptcies in the USA is the old and the sick.

It’s okay if the majority accepts that this is the way things should be and society is the way it is. But don’t anybody fool themselves into thinking that when the sh*t hits the fan that big brother is going to take care of you. If you are self employed or unemployed You are on your own.

DryFire

12:30 am on Dec 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



That is an apples to apples comparison
(i.e. total Canadian tax burden / Canadian GDP compared to Total US tax burden / US GDP = apples to apples)
If you start adding in services provided by the US vs Canadian governments to the equation you get an apples to oranges comparison since the services provided (not just healthcare) are different. At that point you are comparing different things (i.e. apples to oranges)

This thread is starting to stray a long way away from the topic of ecommerce btw.

HRoth

9:38 am on Dec 6, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Not all states allow the Health Savings Account. NY, my state, doesn't. They have their own version of it, but you are not eligible if you make more than $23K a year, which cuts out the vast majority of self-employed people in this state, I'll wager. If you have a C corporation, you can pay your employees' medical expenses out of your gross. But you have to actually be employed with workers comp and all that. This is my only option, as my net is not really enough to carry insurance that would be worth having.

rfontaine

5:09 pm on Dec 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes, Canadian Taxes may be high due to universal health insurance, but what is the difference - the cost of health insurance in the US is sky high. You pay one way or another, through taxes or through lost wages (what your employer pays for health insurance he cannot pass on to you in the form of wages).

If we were not tied to our jobs due to the need for health insurance coverage we could more easily take the risks of starting businesses or staying home and raising kids etc.

Conard

5:30 pm on Dec 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Not all states allow the Health Savings Account. NY, my state, doesn't.

Better check it again as I am in NY State and have had an HSA account since they were MSA accounts. It has nothing to do with the state, it's a federally allowed program.

It requires a high deductible health insurance plan that can be individual or family.
Then you open a separate HSA savings account to deposit your "TAX FREE" money into.

If you go to hsabank dot com you can find all of the information or links to what you need.

Philosopher

5:33 pm on Dec 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm in Texas and ran into this situation a while back. I've been Self employed for about 8 years but never had health insurance as I never saw the need for it (never sick, etc.). Just had a baby girl and decided it was time.

I found a company similar to the NASE and ended up going with them. They had two different policies. One policy primarily covered the big things and left you paying more of the regular doctor visits etc. The second policy had a simple $35 copay for doctors visits and still covered most of the big things as well.

You have to pay for membership into the organization etc, but it still only costs me about $350 and comes with some nice additions (accident policy, small term life plan, etc.)

Anyway, if your interested..sticky me and I'll pass the agents name I dealt with along to you.

4crests

5:39 pm on Dec 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The problem isn't that certain states won't allow it. the real problem is finding a company that will do a savings account for you. They are allowed here in Washington state. However, until recently it was nearly impossible to find a company to do one. Our state legislature made things tough on health insurance companies, so they made it really hard to get a MSA/HSA.

Conard

10:26 pm on Dec 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It's hard to find agents and banks that handle HSA accounts.
M of Omaha still has some states in their high deductible ins programs but not NY. Aetna has them in all states. We are in NY and use a bank in Wisconsin mentioned above for the savings account. This whole program is little known and for good reason, it saves you big bucks and the Ins companies don't want to lose the $$$.
Even Blue x Blue Shield has a high priced high deductible program if you ask the right questions, but why pay triple for the same coverage you can get else where...

ispy

10:18 am on Jan 7, 2006 (gmt 0)



Im getting up there towards middle age and have dental and medical for $100/month through Blue Cross. High deductible, but covers anything serious.

walkman

10:24 am on Jan 7, 2006 (gmt 0)



health care is a freaking joke here in US, and soon or later we must face it. Until this year, I was paying $400+ a month for an HMO despite not seeing a doctor for 4+ years. Now, I got a break with student insurance through my school, but I do pay a fortune in tuition :-).

I was lucky to have enough to afford it during that time, but what about the average family who faces $1000+ a month premiums? How many families have $1200 or so to spare a month?

In some states, there's barely any competiton as insurance companies MUST accept everyone, meaning that a healthy 22 year old will pay for a 80 year old's daily visits to the doctor.