Forum Moderators: buckworks
Now - forgive me for being thick, but I am assuming that since all online transactions are cardholder NOT present transactions, we should NOT be incorporating chip and pin - am I right?
Similarly - if you are EVER asked to put your pin number into an online web form when buying something, this is a violation of your own card use because you cannot tell if you are giving the pin number out to the person that owns the website. Am I right again?
Was anyone trying to incorporate chip and pin into theor site? if so, does my thought process hold true or am I missing something?
Chip and Pin can be implemented on websites
Interesting. Do you think that implementing it on a website gives the merchant provider any more responsibility? I think the terms of business when I look at chip and pin only really protect the merchant more when it is a cardholder present transaction when you look at the small print.
I guess that chip and pin on the site will reduce fraud for the merchant, if not transfer liability to the merchant service provider, but if it is allowed online then I agree - phishing will become rife in the UK with this.
When I spoke to a human at BMS, they decided that our online site should NOT use chip and pin - even though they had been pushing me down that route by letters and even sending me videos on the subject until that point.
according to the woman i spoke to, the customer not present sales (eg online) are not affected and the merchant is still liable for all losses, pin numbers are not required.
... mind you i've spoken to reps before who are then contradicted by another rep at a later point.
Where the customer is not present at the point-of-sale (i.e. mail order, telephone order and internet transactions) chip and PIN does not affect the current situation
[chipandpin.co.uk...]
PIN was always "cardholder present" ..what on earth is the thinking behind anysite asking for pin to be given (even the bank's own sites )...