Forum Moderators: buckworks
I'm working on a site to allow users to keep track of medical records. Obviously it is going to go through SSL.
The plan is to have the main site as [whatever.com...] or [secure.whatever.com....] But, I also plan to have a development subdomain (dev.whatever.com). It would be a version ahead of the main site to allow me to test it, but I would be most likely testing it with live data so I'd prefer it be secure too. Will this require two SSL certificates, or will one cover both since they'll both be at whatever.com.
I have the .com, .net, and .org address for this. I assume that the SSL for the .com and .net address would have to be different. In a perfect world I'd have the [x.com...] address for users and the [dev.x.net...] address for the development version. This would take two certificates, correct?
Thanks,
- Ryan
This scares some customers that have access to the dev server, but if it that's no big deal, there's no need to install a "wildcard" SSL.
You can generate and self-sign your own SSL certificate for use on the dev site. This is pretty simple to do with the OpenSSL tools on Unix or Windows, and there are plenty of how-tos out there.
The self-signed certificate differs from one you pay for only in the level of trust- not encryption- it provides. When you pay for one, you're paying for a so-called "trusted authority" to vouch for your legitimacy as a business or site operator, and they cryptographicaly sign your certificate to attest this. A browser can verify this and present warm fuzzies to the user when they connect. If you're running your dev site, you don't need to prove to the world at large that you are legit- you already know you're legit, you just want the crypto. So you can save some scratch and self-sign.