Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.163.25.166

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

Browser Plugin Group Forms

     
12:45 am on Jul 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38047
votes: 11


The Mozilla Foundation, Opera Software and Apple Computer--all browser makers--said on Wednesday that they have teamed up with plug-in vendors Sun Microsystems, Adobe Systems and Macromedia to revise the way plug-ins run in non-Microsoft browsers.

[news.com.com...]

1:14 am on July 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from CA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 25, 2003
posts:889
votes: 56


For some of the nitty-gritty:
This document describes the new cross-browser NPAPI extensions that has been developed by a group of browser and plugin vendors, ...

[mozilla.org ]
3:54 am on July 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member from AU 

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 20, 2001
posts:167
votes: 0


>Scripting aficionados hailed the partnership

You say partnership, I say cabal ;) <ducks for cover>

Good news if it works and not before time.

10:51 am on July 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 3, 2002
posts:1904
votes: 4


Here is a link to the Official Opera press Release [opera.com].
12:57 pm on July 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:June 29, 2004
posts:8
votes: 0


I think these browser makers are going down the wrong path.

Ultimately, plug-in depends on trust and it has long been proven that you can't trust a plug-in.

The issue simply isn't the technology.

11:03 pm on July 1, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from CA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 25, 2003
posts:889
votes: 56


Ultimately, plug-in depends on trust and it has long been proven that you can't trust a plug-in.

"Plug-in" and "ActiveX" are not synonymous.

When Microsoft replaced the Netscape JVI (Java Runtime Interface) in IE 5.5 SP2 and IE 6.0 with the ActiveX Java/COM Interface (instead of the proposed Java Native Interface) security went the MS way (can you say "swiss cheese"?):

  • advanced garbage collection algorithmns are (almost) impossible to include. (sounds like Windows clutter, doesn't it?)
  • native code has access to public methods and fields.
  • inability to access private fields.
  • inability to raise general exceptions.
  • unable to deal with overloaded methods.
  • case insensitive in matching method names.
  • all classes and all low-level native methods treated as software components.

So we are returning to "plug-ins" and leaving "ActiveX". About time. Stated goals are great. Hope they turn out as good.

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members