Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.197.66.254

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

Will bad HTML Validation on you site mean...?

search engine related.

     
4:36 pm on Jan 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 12, 2003
posts:164
votes: 0


Will bad HTML Validation on your site mean...more chance of having poorer results in the search engines?

Will crawlers ignore your site for indexing or penalize when it crawls?

4:40 pm on Jan 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 22, 2002
posts:2546
votes: 0


It depends just how bad the code is. For the most part, I think they can parse some pretty bad stuff.

It's still in your best interest to validate the pages and eliminate that from the list of things that could damage rankings ;)

4:48 pm on Jan 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 15, 2002
posts:6807
votes: 0


There are times when one single error can make your page not being read by a search engine... For example, an open tag (<p instead of <p>)...
It entirely depends on the search engine, and what the rest of the page looks like.
5:51 pm on Jan 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 18, 2003
posts:202
votes: 0


Yes and no. Even if the page looks OK to a search engine, if it looks bad to me I'm not going to reference it anywhere else, and that hurts your ratings (at least on Google).

Same goes for bad taste -- search engines HATE tasteless designs.

6:16 pm on Jan 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member suzyuk is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 1, 2002
posts:5199
votes: 0


to echo Birdman..

the way I think about it is if your site is easily parsed (correct HTML) then SE spiders will zip through it without "choking" if it has to stumble to try and work something out.. it just might turn around and leave if it's in a hurry or can't find anything else ;)

can't do any harm to be as valid as possible that's for sure

Suzy

8:00 pm on Jan 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


For example, an open tag (<p instead of <p>

I had an example of the open tag phenomonon back in Sept. I was searching for a relatively unique phrase that I KNEW was on a page I built. I wasn't finding it, although that very page was showing up on another search, so I knew it was in the index.

It was a missing > on a <span> tag

Further testing showed that Googlebot's error recovery had kicked in at the next complete tag, but that was 60 important and valuable words later!

Other spiders might be less adept, who knows. Validation can be your friend.

3:24 pm on Feb 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 12, 2003
posts:164
votes: 0


hmmm seems that i need to make sure my pages a in pristine mint clean condition then...

any good places to validate an entire site and not having to validate a single page everytime?

thx

1:27 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 9, 2003
posts:1908
votes: 0


any good places to validate an entire site and not having to validate a single page everytime?

Could be a useful feature, but only think of how long the report could be on a 100 page site with lots of errors! With that said, I'd like to know if such a tool exists, too.

1:34 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 15, 2002
posts:6807
votes: 0


There's really no need for such a tool... if you do things right the first time ;)
Validate your template, then add contents.
1:55 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 22, 2003
posts:127
votes: 0


any good places to validate an entire site and not having to validate a single page everytime?

See: h*ttp://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/batch.html ;)
2:13 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 1, 2002
posts:1017
votes: 2


Can I throw this in as a possibility?

What if the SE's are looking closely at validation as possible SEO?

Just a thought..

2:36 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member pageoneresults is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 27, 2001
posts:12171
votes: 60


What if the SE's are looking closely at validation as possible SEO?

They wouldn't have to look far. There are only a few of us who have taken that route. ;)

Here's an error that doesn't get caught by the validator but causes all sorts of problems. Can you see it?

<!-- HTML Comments -- Insert Comma Separated Keyword Phrase List Here -->

4:03 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 15, 2002
posts:6807
votes: 0


Here's an error that doesn't get caught by the validator but causes all sorts of problems. Can you see it?

<!-- HTML Comments -- Insert Comma Separated Keyword Phrase List Here -->

What kind of problems? And, what's the error?

4:05 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member pageoneresults is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 27, 2001
posts:12171
votes: 60


A common error is to include a string of hyphens ("---") within a comment. Authors should avoid putting two or more adjacent hyphens inside comments.

You could end up commenting out an entire page and not really know it until after the fact.

Validating XHTML 1.1 will flag it as an error.

[edited by: pageoneresults at 4:50 am (utc) on Feb. 3, 2004]

4:07 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 15, 2002
posts:6807
votes: 0


Why would that comment out a page? Only if the browser is buggy :)
Got an example of a browser behaving that way? And, where's the quote from?
4:09 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member pageoneresults is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 27, 2001
posts:12171
votes: 60


From the W3C...

3.2.4 Comments [w3.org]

<added> XHTML 1.1 Validation Results

Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML parser.

Line 16, column 24: S separator in comment declaration
<!-- Testing Comments -- Testing Comments -->

This error is not caught in the HTML 4.01 Strict validation.

Comparison of SGML and XML [w3.org]

Comments
A parameter separator cannot contain comments; this means that markup declarations (other than comment declarations) cannot contain comments
Empty comment declarations (<!> in the reference concrete syntax) are not allowed
A comment declaration cannot contain more than one comment
In a comment declaration, an S separator is not allowed before the final MDC
6:17 am on Feb 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 15, 2002
posts:6807
votes: 0


Interesting! I never knew this! :)
Thanks for bringing it to my attention :)
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members