Forum Moderators: open
Is is a good idea to use includes for the header, so that if the page is requested the SE gets meat only. This will be a include only and not a server side include. Does this make sense?
Cheers
[edited by: korkus2000 at 2:39 pm (utc) on Aug. 13, 2002]
<body>
<!--#include file="topnavigation.html" -->
Main content of page
</body>
I know your going to say use <div>'s instead but I dont have that much say on this particular thing. I would love to use <div>'s and do all the positining externally but people are stuck int their ways.
So my query is this. The user should see all the navigation and all the content but the request from a SE will only really see the content as they dont call the exteranl file, Similar to exteranal JS and CSS. Is this correct or am I off beam with an idea that could cause problems.
Cheers
I know your going to say use <div>'s instead but I dont have that much say on this particular thing. I would love to use <div>'s and do all the positining externally but people are stuck int their ways.
One of the most persuasive arguments against placing an entire page in a table was precisely that it meant the entire page had to download before any part of it was visible, which in the real world of crummy dialup connections, timeouts, internet congestion and the like was far from ideal.