Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.167.46.29

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

Flash?

     
12:16 am on Jan 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 19, 2000
posts:193
votes: 0


Hello,

In the interest of accessibility I have created a site that loafs extremely fast, becuse it contains mostly text (information material, we are not talking about e-business here). I have onw seen that there are programs out there, allowing you to animate content.

My question is now: Will they require a plugin to display that content, or is there a way to 'steam' the content down the line, regardless of the browser?

12:27 am on Jan 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 25, 2000
posts:541
votes: 0


This will make it easy for you [wildform.com]

Very lightweight text animations.

You gotta promise to keep it a secret. ;)

3:02 am on Jan 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


First off, a lot depends on how much text you want to animate. A little bit goes a long way, IMO.

Gif animation has very wide browser support, and animated gif text can be a very small file size, depending on what kind of movement you program. Effects such as a "wipe", where the letters stay in place after they appear, can only a little more file space than static gif lettering.

Flash (which does require a plug-in) has wide support. Not as much as animated gif, but somewhere between 83% and 97% depending on whose stats you believe.

Java can also animate text, but I wouldn't mess with it -- many people are long-time frustrated with client side Java. It is slow to render (the Java Virtual Machine has to load first) and often hangs or crashes various browsers.

DHTML (JavaScript plus CSS) can also do something like animation. However, cross browser compatibility can be a real bear, and the final results are usually not too smooth, except on faster machines.

GWJ

2:20 pm on Jan 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:June 21, 2000
posts:339
votes: 0


Just a side note here. One thing that I have found is if you have content (read text) that you want someone to digest keep animations away from it. It gets very distracting. On some sites I even turn off graphics as it gets too intrusive.

Brian

4:01 pm on Jan 31, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
posts:37301
votes: 0


Right on, GWJ --

Especially if the animation is set to loop infinitely.

Sometimes, used very sparingly, a single loop animation can be an attention getter. But then any further motion is distracting.

The most easy to take animations are those that duplicate natural motion, rather than cartoon-like antics. Wind, water, or even a drop of blood dripping from a rose ;) -- that kind of subtle effect can enhance a page when used with good taste.