Forum Moderators: open
[nypl.org ]
Take a look at this:
(html
(head
(title "Hello world")
(meta '((http-equiv "Content-Type")
(content "text/html")
(charset "iso-8859-1")))
(link '((rel "stylesheet")
(title "default")
(href "css/style.css")
(type "text/css"))))
(body
(h1 "Hello world!")
(p "Paragraph... more text...")))
It is a common belief now that xml is just another version of lisp with a make up. A bit of knowledge on functional languages was very helpful to me to understand XHTML.
So not one of you has a book in your collection - say O'Reilly's HTML & XHTML: The Definitive Guide - just for reference?
I must be an odd duck because I have this thing for books. I find them much easier to read and refer to than reading from a resource on the web. That being said, I do refer to W3C as THE final authority and come here for guidance when I'm in a jam. It's fair to say I count on the web as the most current - and the best resource for the nitty gritty details. I usually include a good print resource, though, just to round out my knowledge (and be kind to my eyes).
So not one of you has a book in your collection - say O'Reilly's HTML & XHTML: The Definitive Guide - just for reference?
I do. I used _Learn HTML 4.0 in 21 Days_ to learn HTML, and O'Reilly's guide to learn HTML (although it's taken more than 21 days -- I am still learning new things!).
Online, I find that WDG's HTMLHelp is a great resource. Also, as much as it pains me to write it, Microsoft also has a really good resource for the IE implementation of CSS/HTML/DHTML on its MSDN site.
xml is just another version of lisp
You know, I've wondered about this. Are there any Scheme/Lisp backends (i.e. instead of PHP)? I love Scheme.
In answer to the original question, I find one of the best resources for learning XHTML is the W3c Validator. Build pages, submit and repeat as necessary.
Tom