Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.158.36.59

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

What is this full doctype

learned HTML in 96 - did this come since then?

     
9:25 pm on Mar 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member annej is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



I find I can't validate my pages because I don't have a doctype. What is it anyway? Why do I need it? I've been building web pages for 10 years and they seem to work fine.
9:54 pm on Mar 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



Here's the basics from the W3C:

Don't forget to add a doctype - add what? [w3.org]
List of Valid Doctypes [w3.org]

12:09 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member annej is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



"add what?" says it all.

This pretty much describes me, "the browser assumes you’ve written old-fashioned, invalid markup and code per the depressing industry norms of the late 1990s."

That's me. I learned HTML the old fashioned way, by looking at other people's source code. I can't begin to imagine which kind of HTML it is. I try it and if it works I use it.

Would this be the code for me?

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

1:03 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Best for you? That all depends. Transitional 4.01 is ok if you just code HTML but I like XHTML strict because it is bulletproof across browsers (which decreases your QA time) and I am a pixel nazi.
3:31 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member annej is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



All I do is hand coded html and css.
6:21 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



I would say: start with HTML 4.01 Transitional. Get that to work and validate. Then move on to HTML 4.01 Strict.

You will be amazed at the structural things you will learn about HTML simply by fixing minor validation errors. :)

I hand code everything as well and have used a doctype in my documents for 6 years now. Using a doctype (and validation) has made me more aware of what I'm actually doing. In the end I have become a better coder.

9:49 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'd agree with DrDoc - definitely move to Strict eventually. That's what transitional's for: an intermediate step to make the path to strict less painful.
10:50 am on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



The attitude of "if it works, I use it and if it comes out on screen alright I don't care about anything else" really doesn't work with the web...
1:43 pm on Mar 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



The attitude of "if it works, I use it and if it comes out on screen alright I don't care about anything else" really doesn't work with the web...

Actually, the problem is that it DOES work. If omitting </html> caused your entire document to fail in all browsers, then we wouldn't have a hodgepodge of would-be web designers spewing out code riddled with errors; we'd have people who know how to write code, and people who don't.

And as always, let's all keep in mind that we're members of a web design forum, and so we're in the minority (ironically) of people who put stuff on the web. Most people- even if they knew the consequences- would rather just have it not work on a Mac, or in Opera, or sans-Javascript, than be bothered to learn how to do it right... and they can't be blamed for not wanting to hire a web designer or buy a book on standards, because at the root, the web is (and should be) a place for everyone to exchange information and ideas- not another cha-ching industry where you're expected to "pay to play" if you want to post any content online.

annej, I think you'll find that you're probably not too far off from where you need to be in creating correct markup. Surf around for info on standards, doctype, etc, and i'm sure you'll be on top of your game in no time.

7:35 pm on Mar 25, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member annej is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



I see Doc types without the "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> at the end. Is it necessary?
8:23 pm on Mar 25, 2006 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



Doctype without url is same as no doctype at all.

For details check out
Activating the Right Layout Mode Using the Doctype Declaration
[hsivonen.iki.fi...]

[edited by: encyclo at 9:39 pm (utc) on Mar. 25, 2006]
[edit reason] fixed link [/edit]

6:21 pm on Mar 27, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rocknbil is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



^ ^ edited: simul-post :-)

I see Doc types without the "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> at the end. Is it necessary?

If you don't include the URL in the doctype, it throws IE into "quirks mode" which is in many cases the same effect as having no doctype at all. While this works in your favor in most cases by "forgiving" coding errors, it can also work against you by not suporting somethnig specific to your selected doctype.

Don't feel so bad about being an oldschool handcoder (me too.) Taking the steps to get up to speed is better than most do.

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month