Forum Moderators: skibum
Here is a thread from a week or two ago:
Adsense Alternatives? [webmasterworld.com]
With espotting they have to put a piece of unique code on every page and as there site has 1000īs of pages and changing content this is just a nightmare.
Doug
Eric
Eric
For me to move away from AdSense to a competitor would require a serious increase in revenue.
Google AdSense has an awful lot going for it, the targetted ads are great, colours etc but what makes it truly special is that it is Google.
The fact that it is Ads by Google adds confidence to viewers, and that has got to be the biggest challenge for any competitor.
But, if the only advertising a content site will allow is keyword advertising instead of other types such as affiliate advertising then Google is definately the best choice. At least for now. It won't be long before advertisers realize that a lot of times they are being charged to much for a contextual match by doing keywords. Meaning that a match can often be made by less expensive words found on a site but if the most expensive word is there - guess what the advertiser gets charged?
Personally I wouldn't limit myself to just one source of revenue though.
OK, it's probably not got a big database of advertisers. But AdSense's targeting is much more accurate.
Interestingly, each ad shows the keyword that the advertiser chose - and how much they pay per click.
Now that would be something, wouldn't it, if Google gave us so much info :-)
D.
I disagree with what you say re having a site to pull ads from different arenas. Why?
Well I am happy with Google and G has brand recognition I trust them and their targetting abilities. Plus putting the control in hands of a third party is silly as obviously they would take money from the revenue.
You're right about detail. Whay doesn't Google say how much someone paid? I think it's because advertisers pay too much but don't realize it. I know from testing this stuff that matches can be made by using less expensive keywords but if Google finds an expensive word they use it instead. Good for Google and the sites but bad for the advertiser.
Eric
Ive mentioned it before. Its text ads but not contextual (advertisers and owners choose which sites and ads to have) and ads are limited. BAsically it runs like an introduction agency and third party reporting server, but you can choose your own fees of which text ads.biz takes a cut. Advertisers can choose to have ads on just your site or others as well, and both advertiser and site owner have their own reporting screens.
We were looking at trying this out before Adsense came along...
Not promoting anything. The question was asked on this thread if there were any competitors :-)
Why pull ads from different arenas? Why only shop at one store?
Not sure why it would be silly or why it is obvious that a third party would steal. There are quite a few players out there such as DoubleClick, ValueClick, CJ etc. that are honest folks and have done some great things as far as online advertising goes.
I agree that if the only form of advertising you want is keyword advertiser then by all means stay with Google :-)
Eric
Sadly, their technical setup seems really flawed. Their statements abbout their use of CSS seem simply untrue, and I could not get the ads to display nicely without hige amount of wasted space due to the frame spacing that I could not control (contrary to their FAQ).
Also they make no statements regarding to payouts, and I cannot see one reason why I should put the ads up.
It is so close and yet such a wasted chance. If they fix those things I'd use it in a heartbeat for it's greater flexibility, but only if it pays.
SN
Sadly, their technical setup seems really flawed. Their statements abbout their use of CSS seem simply untrue, and I could not get the ads to display nicely without hige amount of wasted space due to the frame spacing that I could not control (contrary to their FAQ).
Kind of an interesting statement since I had no problem with the css or the frame spacing although it was not clear that the frame spacing and dimensions need to be identical and threw me for a loop the first time I tried it.
I'm not sure what you didn't see about the payouts as I saw the specifics in the FAQ. What I did notice about the payouts though is that they are dependant on the ppc suppliers. Notice I said suppliers. Seems as if they are either now pulling or are going to pull from different sources.
I have to agree with linkshark. Nothing proprietary but interesting how it is implemented. Seems to be just like Overture, AdSense, DoubleClick etc.
But I have to disagree with it being like Ezula and the other scumware. Ezula needs the user to install their crap and then they hijack a user and do not share revenue with the rightful owner of the content where these guys share revenue and there is no plugin.
[webmasterworld.com...]