On Hold: This discussion is temporarily on hold pending administrative

This simply means there was something about the post worth reviewing...

[le_gber]

If it has been for more than 20 hours should I think that it won't be 'validated'?

The post was about hidden text and I wanted to help google by launching a hidden-text buster session in google SERP and pointing out the techniques that still work - like hidden divs or noscript tags. There was a link to google spam report for the willing.

Leo

[Marketing Guy]

Im sure any public discussion about specific spam techniques that work would be a no-no.

Scott

[Marcia]

>>any public discussion about specific spam techniques that work would be a no-no.

Yes. Tell me or other concerned individuals privately and we will be glad to test them. To verify your findings, of course. For research purposes. ;)

>>wanted to help google by launching a hidden-text buster session in google SERP and pointing out the techniques that still work

le_gber, I don't recall the post, but was there anything that could possibly relate to an issue covered in the TOS or the recently revised and updated

Google Forum News charter [webmasterworld.com]?

Can you please stickymail me the title of the original post so we can check into it? We do not discuss moderating issues of any kind, as per the

WebmasterWorld Terms of Service [webmasterworld.com],

but as always, if there's anything relevant we'd be happy to respond and discuss it by stickymail.

Thanks!