Forum Moderators: open
Brett Do you know who GoogleGuy really is? :)
[edited by: internetbrothers at 3:32 pm (utc) on May 29, 2003]
>>Brett Do you know who GoogleGuy really is?
Yes he do. (Just guessing again ;) )
internetbrothers it's looks like you've been given a completly good answer in the thread below.
[edited by: lazerzubb at 3:37 pm (utc) on May 29, 2003]
I know Bret answere the following:
>lol. What would you put in there for a date?
More importantly, what would you put in there for a moon cycle? lol
but there must be a date or something in there!?
Pushing out a database that consists of data from Feb/March doesn't cut it. That would be better labeled as a backdate.
If/When Google resumes publishing new databases containing recent deepcrawl data, you will probably see the update page get updated.
Throw a dart for the date. For the moon cycle I'd just write "eclipse".
ROFLMAO. This really made my day. I just can't stop laughing :) :)
Historically an update started when the backlinks to a number of cornerstones changed on www2/www3....and the update finished when data on each data center was updated.
We have been through the above, so why is this not declared as an update?
If Google wants to declare this as a "work in progress" then that is up to them. To me we have seen the update (albeit half baked).
A "work in progress" can go on forever, so on that basis we will never see another Google update again?
Whether you think these results are good, bad, indifferent, half baked or just plain junk, I don't see how anyone can disagree that an update of some type has occurred (an update with old data is still an update).
If not we have to conclude Google updates are a thing of the past, in which case any thread dicussing future Google updates become an irrelevance as we have no way to measure when it may occur!
This certainly has not occured. Maybe we can just call it a DIFFERENT INDEX.
Great post, as usaul, WebG!
