Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 34.225.194.144

Forum Moderators: Webwork & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

dmoz and newhoo - don't really understand the difference

     
10:00 pm on Mar 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 12, 2002
posts:582
votes: 0


I was under the impression that newhoo was the original name of ODP. I have heard people mention newhoo but that was all I knew about it. Recently I got a site listed in ODP and now with the recent backlinks update in Google I see newhoo listed as a backlink for that site, but not dmoz.

I guess this is more of a Google question, but does it usually only count the dmoz or the newhoo link and not both? The dmoz page my site is linked from has a much higher PR than the newhoo site. Please don't think I'm really complaining though - I'm thrilled to death to get the ODP link and even more happy the site is now showing some PR, I had been worried that the site had been penalized or something as it had been a PR0 for a really long time. I would have been even more happy if Google was counting the higher PR page though.

10:14 pm on Mar 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 28, 2002
posts:153
votes: 0


There is no difference; www.gnuhoo.org is a DNS equivalent name to dmoz.org ; they resolve to the same tcp/ip address. Netscape acquired the "gnuhoo.org" domain along with its listings. They kept the original URL active to support websites which had linked to gnuhoo.

-- Rich

10:21 pm on Mar 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member from US 

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 20, 2002
posts:556
votes: 0


From an August 2003 thread here [webmasterworld.com], GoogleGuy said:

steveb, I didn't realize that you were talking about a link: query. Having newhoo.com showing up in backlinks wouldn't affect things. I'll ask tomorrow someone tomorrow to make sure, but that wouldn't affect PageRank/rankings/traffic/etc.

I couldn't find where GG confirms this after "asking someone tomorrow" so I'll assume GG confirmed it & didn't need to clarify his/her answer.

rmjvol

11:03 pm on Mar 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 17, 2001
posts:1262
votes: 0


Very odd! Googling link:newhoo.com turns up 381,000 results, even though it is now just a mirror:

gnuhoo.com = newhoo.com = directory.mozilla.org = dmoz.org

I guess Google's crawler finding those alternative urls from extremely old sites that linked to the directory prior to the late 1998/early 1999 name changes, and haven't been updated since.

11:29 pm on Mar 18, 2004 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 12, 2002
posts:582
votes: 0


so newhoo and gnuhoo are both basically the same as dmoz.org then?

Thanks for the link rmjvol. I read through that thread but didn't see where GoogleGuy ever responded back again. What steveb was saying is exactly right though. In my case the dmoz page has a PR of 7 and the corresponding newhoo page only has PR of 4, so my index page got a 3. I have a number of other links through exchanges made a long time ago, but they have never showed up as backlinks, presumably because they have a really low PR. So the newhoo one is the only one making a significant contribution to the sites PR.

10:40 pm on Mar 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


Hmm, Google should realise by now that these sites are all really the exact same site.

GoogleGuy hinted last week that they take a guess that two sites are really the same site, and update that data every few months.

I wonder why these are still showing as separate items several years later?

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members