Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 184.108.40.206
Lil' Johnny built a website, and look, moving graphics ma, ain't he good?
I might be just a touch overly critical tonight, I've reviewed about 6 sites in a row that all had terrible code, animated screen thieves everywhere, one even had blinking and scrolling text, all done of course by the "web whiz" for a particular company.
Paraphrased Quote- "Yeah, we like the way the sites look but we're concerned about our sales, we projected much higher".
a computer hasnt shipped in years without at least 1024/768 as default... and im pretty sure the 800x600'ers are used to being behind and having the scroll a little. The last time I showed someone a site made for 800x600, last year, I was lambasted for being way behind the curve and catering the the stone ages... arent my friends dramatic? :)
Code is awful though and a major web property really needs to validate.
It truly amazes me how a page with as little content that is there can generate over 100 errors in the html. Something isn't right! ;)
Shame on you for using fixed font sizes!
Support LookSmart's never-ending quest to deliver the best search results....advertisers can buy
its a nice touch.
The search results pages look better. I hope the click counter has been updated as well. Looks like everyone is trying to morph into a Googlish simple layout.
They don't want anyone spidering their links. Robots.txt shows :
This is what I see in the robots.txt file..
This would allow bots into then category folder where the pages in the directory reside.
<edited by Quinn> Sorry Webwalla, just realized that you and skibum were referring to looksmart, not zeal</edit>