Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Dmoz search working again.

         

aek

4:32 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dmoz search now updated Jan 29th and it's showing new listings when searching.

aek

4:34 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Gone back to Sep 28th again.

hurlimann

4:48 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



down again :(

Jon_King

5:12 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



So far this thread is hilarious! HA!

I haven't been able to much there in over a week. It’s starting to get annoying.

Napoleon

8:25 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)



Well.. it seems to be flip-flopping between:

Wed Jan 29 20:50:26 PST 2003
and
Sat Sep 28 00:54:00 PDT 2002

If they can just stabilize on the first we might finally be there with a new dump... which would be good news all round.

Fingers crossed.

aus_dave

8:33 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The Open Directory search is currently under a heavy load. Please try back later.

I think I'll wait for the enthusiasm to die down ;).

For the record my first search had September and the refreshed error page had January so maybe something is happening after all.

[edit] Hit the refresh button and now the January results are returning recently added sites and cat changes...very good news :) [/edit]

John_Caius

9:09 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The search has been updated with the results from the last unsuccessful RDF dump. However a successful RDF dump hasn't been produced yet - a little while longer to wait at least if everything goes to plan.

OntheEdge

9:12 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is that why I'm having so much trouble editing my category? I keep getting server errors. So that means its temporary until the excitement dies off?

Jon_King

9:13 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Definitely an update... a new sub-directory is showing!

Napoleon

9:38 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)



With the update it sort of looks all nice and shiney new. Good stuff.

I presume you are some sort of Meta Editor John? If so, is there high expectation that the RDF will work this time?

theseeker

9:46 pm on Jan 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



An rdf dump without catids has been produced and is available here:
[rdf.dmoz.org ]

The search index has also been updated, and progress has been made toward solving the catid problems, so hopefully a full rdf with catids will be available soon.

enarra

4:21 am on Jan 31, 2003 (gmt 0)



From what I gather there are two machines running the search on dmoz (correct me if I'm wrong other metas). One has been updated and the other is a little behind. If you get a search result with a Sept. date just hit refresh until you get a better result.

OntheEdge, the server time outs aren't related to the search or RDF. I'd suggest reading some of the posts in the internal Bugs and Features forum, they should give you more information on what's happening and how it's being fixed.

OntheEdge

3:32 pm on Jan 31, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Will do

rfgdxm1

9:25 pm on Feb 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>From what I gather there are two machines running the search on dmoz (correct me if I'm wrong other metas).

I have no idea what the truth is, but I can't imagine Netscape being *that* clueless they wouldn't. For something like the ODP, redundency seems an obvious must. Otherwise one hard drive crash could take the whole thing down. Would Netscape want to publicly look like bozos with this happening? As for cost, load on the ODP isn't that great, and wouldn't require any sort of expensive boxes. This sort of redunancy would require maybe a few thousand at most in hardware. Chicken feed compared to the cost of the 2 paid staffers.

shady

11:47 pm on Feb 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Please google - dump open directory! It serves absolutely no purpose other than a human entity to google's rankings. As google know how to run a system which serves the web and dmoz make such a diabolical job of it, why can't google come up with their own replacement for dmoz.org!

Just my opinion of course!

steveb

2:44 am on Feb 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"It serves absolutely no purpose other than a human entity to google's rankings."

My head serves absolutely no purpose except to sit on my shoulders.

shady

11:59 am on Feb 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



:)