Forum Moderators: open
What is meant when ODP editors are accused of "cooling a site"?
Sorry if this is obvious, but English is a second language for me, and I have no idea whatsoever.
René.
"Editors may not cool their own sites or any sites with which they are affiliated, including business or personal affiliations. Doing so is contrary to ODP's policy and mission to provide a fair and objective resource for end-users. It is also contrary to this policy to request another editor to cool a site with which you are affiliated. Misuse of the cool site feature may result in removal of your editing privileges."
This information was also included in the same brief note. I have never seen a "cool" listing on my journeys through the ODP listings.
Could one of the editors point me in the direction of a category which actually shows a "cool site" listing. I'd really like to see what the listing itself looks like and what makes the site "cool".
The same editor (who has since been canned ... likely because he/she gave out to much inside info), also told me that there was some sort of a bad notation attached to my ODP file from a previous editor and that the "cooling" had been rejected.
Oh well, it was nice to know that (if nothing else) he/she liked the site enough to nominate it!
Do the editors ever go back a year or two after a site has been entered into the index to see if enough content has been added to warrant the "cool site" award? Or is this just too time consuming? Do bad notations from editors ever get removed or are you stuck with the stigma forever?
I have seen some categories with asterisks, so some editors do it.
René.
So, if one just keeps producing more and more informative content ... which will benefit not only my customers but anyone interested in the subject, do the editors ever re-review a site which is already in the database?
Then the site for which they write the content appears twice more (apart from the cool listing) in categories they edit .. well ..
Talk about asking to be complained about..
Dont want negative notes against all my later submissions so I will give them another week to respond to my enquiry email, more than 2 months has gone by since the initial submission attempt. (edited wrote 1 month - meant 2)
However, it has a pretty minimal effect on traffic as most of the downstream users (e.g. Google) ignore the "cool" status altogether and present the information differently.
Correct me if I am wrong but I would have expected it to have increased the PR transferred to the site in question (in google) especially if the links and text were "not" precisely the same.
I remember threads where the editor would "jump UP & DOWN" when caught saying " well it IS the BEST site"
GONE :)
Then report this to a meta. Or any editor at all, even me. Unless abuse is reported, it can't be properly dealt with. As at the moment I am an editor of a very high level cat, I would forward all abuse complaints I recieved the the appropriate people. Remember, the ODP is just a bunch of volunteers.
What percentage of cooled sites are ones owned by editors or are ones that editors are affiliated with in some manner?
What percentage of cooled sites are ones owned by editors or are ones that editors are affiliated with in some manner?
In principle, close to zero.
In practice, probably too many. Report abuse if you think you see it.
Or any editor at all, even me.
Mighty nice of you. I'll bite.
I came across a web site that on the surface looked well optimized. But on closer inspection, layers started coming off, revealing redirects, hidden links, pages full of nothing but hundreds of links.
Their seo efforts kept looking darker and dirtier the deeper I looked into it. I half expected to come across the corpses of webmasters who had gotten in their way, but instead was shocked to discover that this spammy commercial web site had not only been cooled, but was listed in Five different categories!
So I stickied you with the info.
Dynamoo are you saying that 2 links rather than 1 from an ODP page with a Google PR of lets say 6/10 has no more downstream effect than one link from that page?
Cooling a site doesn't add a second link, it just moves the link "up" visually and puts a star by it. It only appears once.
Sometimes duplicate listings can occur by accident if the link has a slightly different URL. No site should have more than one listing in a category in any case except in very exception circumstances (typically deeplinks to hard-to-find content on a site).
I have never seen a "cool" listing on my journeys through the ODP listings.Could one of the editors point me in the direction of a category which actually shows a "cool site" listing. I'd really like to see what the listing itself looks like and what makes the site "cool".
Cooling occurs a lot in the non-commercial categories, just browse around outside Shopping into the same of the more heavily populated categories and you'll find one.
