Forum Moderators: bakedjake
I was just thinking about this thread [webmasterworld.com] and about how much impact it could have on these search engines if it was in a worldwide journal.
People reading the results and looking at the various search engines mentioned.
Can you imagine the shifts in their traffic depending on the trends published?
Very brilliant insight, and worthy of discussion. Gigablast, SearchHippo, Kartoo, OpenFind, WiseNut - they've all got people that read here, the authors are here, they take notes. We tell them things, and they listen. *if* you like the idea of more competition = better for everybody in the search engine space, show your support: What would you like to see, implications for the current state of affairs, is there someplace nobody else is going that you would like a search engine to go?
Brett, Jeremy et al, what is so hard about making another forum? I'm sure there's plenty of people here who would be happy to moderate
Should we start a campaign for it? :)
So, why does AllTheWeb have a slot and not Inktomi nor Altavista?
As to AllTheWeb, they were the last to include pay-for-play and they introduced it in a style similar to Google's, the ads were clearly delineated as ads and not easily confused with unbiased SERPs. Further, this was done to enhance an adequate revenue stream, not as a desperate act of survival.
Recently, Overture acquired ATW and AV, Yahoo acquired Ink, and MSN is rumored to be spidering. When another leader emerges in the search biz, I'm confident the forums will be rearranged accordingly.
Two days later, and we are having an enlightening discussion on Search Hippo on that thread
[webmasterworld.com...]
Kevin Marcus has given us a lot of information on what he is doing and the direction he hopes to go.
But in general I agree with martinibuster's thought that there is not enough interest to have separate forum's on any other search engines. However is is certainly worth my time looking at the "other" players, to see what their ideas are and the direction they are heading.
Bottom line is Google will have to work hard to remain dominant, and anyone not knowing what is happening what other SEs could be vulnerable in the long term
I'm with Kartoo4u - Webmasterworld seems to be more interested in pleasing the Google 'gods' more than anything else - again has to make you wonder.
Though I'm sure this post will be removed 'ala Brett' or some Moderator, I just wanted to vent how frustrating it is that making Google sound good, seems to be more important than real 'open' communication/discussion.
I am a 'paid' member and must admit that I regret doing so ( good tax write-off if nothing else ) but, the censorship to please Google should stop. If this Website is truly interested in the 'webmaster', we should allow Kartooguy, Yahooguy and any other search engine guy/gal to be able to post as 'freely' as the mysterous Googleguy.
Lastly... if Google can have multiple forums... I can't imagine that it's asking too much to have 1 or 2 for the 'others'.
Enough of my rant... my apologies to anyone that may be offended. ( assuming this post doesn't get censored as well)... and no, I'm not affiliated with any search engine - just tired of the blatent 'pansiness' towards Google.
I just wanted to add that I have nothing against Google, think it's a great engine ( hopefully I won't get a pr0 for this). :)
The reality of life is that the chattering classes have a lot to say about Google, and not a lot to say about the others. You cannot give them enough forums to chat about Google...
... on the other hand few are interested in posting about engines that are not delivering browsers to their web sites.
The same situation exists in "Directories" , the vast majority of posts are about DMOZ, usually with a tie in to Goole links. You do not see much interest in JoeAnt, GoGuides, etc.
Its a grim old world out there ;(
The same situation exists in "Directories" , the vast majority of posts are about DMOZ, usually with a tie in to Goole links. You do not see much interest in JoeAnt, GoGuides, etc.
I have applied the rule 'three strikes and you're out' to my posts in WebmasterWorld. I tried three times to provide what I thought was relevant information about a (then) new directory - and they were all pronptly removed.
I could have replied to all the points raised in drfence of the current TOS - but I don't feel it would make any difference. It seems that the high ranking at Alexa is a solid proof that 'we must be doing something right - so why change'. This is a vanity symptom that, sadly, befalls many succesful companies at their prime, with predictable consequences. The examples are just everywhere.
For me, the irony is that WebmasterWorld gives all the publicity to the big guys (read 'Google') and vigorously denies it from the small ones - yet claims to encourage discussion and help promote competition.
Finally, the real sad thing is that bobothecat was quite sure that his post will be deleted or maimed. So am I. Shouldn't that ring some alarm bells?
MC