Forum Moderators: bakedjake
I try also some Dublin Core meta or some other generic with no sucess.
The post on the blog [gigablast.com] of Matt Wells (owner of Gigablast)
[edited by: Allergic at 11:15 pm (utc) on Oct. 12, 2003]
Unfortunately, Matt chose some rather non-standard meta tags to look at. Going with something established like Dublin Core would make a lot more sense.
Bird, I don't understand your post. Gigablast indexes all meta tags now, not just dublin, but any meta tag you care to invent, as long as the meta "name" is one word (string of alphanumeric characters). Therein lies the power.
Matt Wells
It is a great tool to find the generator of the code. But sometimes it show you the wrong information like this search on generator:frontpage [gigablast.com] where some generator tag show you Adobe GoLive :-(
Ok, Gigablast now supports hyphens, underscores and periods in the name of the meta tag. Before it was only supporting alphanumeric characters. So now all the dublin core tags should work.
Allergic, the reason you were seeing an Adobe GoLive result was that the cached page you were viewing is not 100% in sync with the index. I do this to save computing resources, but you can append a "&seq=0" to the url and you will get the latest summaries, titles and metas.
Alrighty then... is everything working perfect now or what? :>
Matt Wells
1) Allow Meta Tag searches in site-specific-search forms (free or paid). Then, a webmaster could put a form on their site which would let people search their site (one domain) for any field they wanted, like the "Color" of a widget, or the "Weight" of the widget. I think Meta Tags are useless on global searches because of spam. Conversly, local site searches are of little value without meta-tags (i.e. custom fields) since they usually pull up totally unrelated pages because they happen to have a certain word anywhere in the page.
2) Apparently GigaBlast now supports a blank name Meta Tag, and retrieves the pages with words that are in the "value" of this meta tag, even when those words don't appear in visible text. I confirmed this happened by looking in the cache of the page.