Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

10 Golden Rules to Linking

         

Mike12345

2:52 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What would you guys say the 10 Golden Rules to linking are?
Like a kind of guide to efficient webmaster friendly linking.

What are the DO's and Dont's to linking?

Any offerings?

:)

le_gber

2:56 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



  • link to relevant site/pages inside a site
  • use appropriate anchor text for the link
  • link to site that you can trust (you have checked and they don't use spammy tech)
  • one way link are better (if the link is TO your site)
  • linking to notorious people (high PR) in your field MAY be beneficial

    anybody else?

    leo

    <edited>typos + 'notorious people' explained</edited>

    [edited by: le_gber at 3:04 pm (utc) on April 11, 2003]

  • brotherhood of LAN

    3:01 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



    linking out
    -whichever way you link, make sure there's an easy way to track them, i.e. 404 city
    -for the one's that are not 404, worth taking a peak/spider to see that it's the same content.
    -link to lots of sites with high PR, lots of backlinks, or generally appear on all the SERP's you wish to be in (on topic of course ;o))

    robertito62

    4:15 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

    10+ Year Member



    avoid closed circles. Like BOL said, link out.

    Closed circles hoard page rank. Not good. Selfishness.

    Other terms I came across when investigating this: dead leaf, subgraph and link sink. More experienced board members feel free to correct me.

    edit_g

    4:30 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



    I'm going to drop the proverbial bomb here:
    Don't link out! Just don't do it.

    paynt

    4:40 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)



    Hang on edit_g, we're soon going to have a whole conversation on that so let us not get distracted from the topic. I want to talk about this edit_g, really.

    robertito62

    5:10 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

    10+ Year Member



    can't wait paynt, have to answer...

    edit_g,
    sure it might be better in the near term but if my interpretation of some of the papers that are out there is correct, preserving PR this way might create a series of problems search engines need to avoid in order to provide better SERPS, like avoiding infinite loops.

    Oaf357

    5:26 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

    10+ Year Member



    Never robots.txt or nofollow a page with links on it. It's just rude.

    paynt

    5:47 pm on Apr 11, 2003 (gmt 0)



    I did start it robertito62 at,

    Reasons Not To Link
    Standing alone?
    [webmasterworld.com]

    I forgot to come back here and let you all know. edit_g did let me know there will be further comment in that discussion to follow so keep an eye open.

    Mike12345

    9:49 am on Apr 14, 2003 (gmt 0)

    10+ Year Member



    Its all good so far :)

    Has anyone got anymore to add? It would be much appreciated.

    What about the effective use of in/cross site links? How much can that help/hinder us?