Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.147.44.93

Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Linking question full URL or relative

     

KevinC

9:10 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hey I couldn't find an answer to this with a site search and would like someones help on this one.

When building websites I have always used links like : hosting.html or index.html but should I be using the full url instead like: [widget.com...] or [widget.com...]

What are the advantages and disadvantages?

europeforvisitors

10:00 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)



Google has absolutely no problem with relative links, and I've done very well in Google while using them. I prefer relative links because they make for simpler code, they load faster, they make a small contribution to reducing Net congestion, and they're easier to maintain.

Still, not everyone shares my preference.

For an argument in favor of relative links, see:
[boogiejack.com...]

For an argument in favor of absolute links, see:
[searchengineworld.com...]

KevinC

10:39 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hey thanx for the point in the right direction!

andreasfriedrich

11:34 pm on Nov 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Or use the base element [w3.org] to specify an absolute URI that acts as the base URI for resolving relative URIs on your page.

This makes for smaller pages than absolute URIs and still works in things like Google´s cache.

Andreas

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month