Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Whenever you click back on the resource button the site would go back to the orginal content that was on the site. The script they used was in java.
I looked on yahoo cache and they did read the content that was in the resouce area. Do you think that is considered hidden text?
If it was there for the benefit of the visitors
Thanks for your comments
The content is still there for both the search engines and the surfer. Because the content can be seen and the conetnt is informational about the subject of the site. But that is just my opinion, I guess we really wouldnt know unless we asked the Search engines themselves :) cause it is prolly considered in the gray area.
If not I have some pages to change. For reasons of keeping things pretty one of my sites has collapsable product descriptions. It is in a div that only displays when requested, but if you request the source it is in there and does get indexed.
I think I am going to Email G for a ruling on this before someone else emails them to complain. I hadn't even considered that this could be deamed 'hidden text' as described in the TOS.
Funny thing is G inspired me to do it after I saw their Google.com/ig pages that have all the info hidden in divs until you request them with a click. When I saw it I thought it was a great way of originizing info that was needed at a glance but still have more information available with a mouse click and no extra server hit needed.
Funny thing is G inspired me to do it after I saw their Google.com/ig pages that have all the info hidden in divs until you request them with a click. When I saw it I thought it was a great way of originizing info that was needed at a glance but still have more information available with a mouse click and no extra server hit needed.
That seems ok to me, but the way the OP described the content, it seemed like it was deliberately put in a location where it would not be readily accessible. I would be willing to bet anything that that would not pass a manual inspection.