Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 3.85.245.126

Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Getting links for months

How many months you banking on now?

     
2:31 pm on May 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 24, 2002
posts:1094
votes: 0


We are getting links for many sites now and I do not expect to see the sites in the google serps for 9 months to a year. That is ok because I know I will get the cash back. The day of the small guy has gone as this takes significant resources for a return far in the future for new sites.

Any small guys getting frustrated and giving up?

6:50 pm on May 10, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 8, 2004
posts:63
votes: 0


well..first let me admit...im a still a newb when it comes to great SEO. However, I have noticed how much things have changed over the past 6 months. At one point after about 2 months I was ready to quit..Didn't seem like I was seeing results at all...Now today I watch my visitors number increase each month since January. My PR has been increasing by 1 each month, and my link popularity is increasing daily..Although I may not be a seasoned pro like some of the guys and girls on this board im working on it..and learning more each day! to the SEO pros, we salute you! I've gotten so much of my information and learned a great deal from these forums its amazing..so thanks everyone for being so helpful and informative..ok, thats enough ranting from me for now :)
4:10 am on May 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member caveman is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 17, 2003
posts:3744
votes: 0


I don't see those sorts of lags. FWIW. Unless a site's already in the cooler.
5:31 am on May 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator martinibuster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 13, 2002
posts:14935
votes: 494


My PR has been increasing by 1 each month...

That's not possible for you to know. Toolbar PR is updated once every three months.

5:41 am on May 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 17, 2004
posts:463
votes: 0


Martinibuster -

Is the 3 month toolbar PR lag for sure or speculation?

6:13 am on May 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator martinibuster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 13, 2002
posts:14935
votes: 494


It's a noted fact.

PR Update April 21, 2005
[webmasterworld.com...]

PR Update January 1, 2005
[webmasterworld.com...]

Thread from Feb 2005 that notes the three month lag has been going on since October 2004

"toolbar" pr updates have been occuring every 3 months or so. The last 3 updates are as follows: January 1st, October 7th, June 22nd
If this trend continues the next pr update should occur around the beginning of April.

The PR that's shown on the toolbar seems to be a snapshot from a few weeks prior to when it's updated. There is an up to date measure at the Googleplex.

This is why someone started a thread [webmasterworld.com] in this forum recently, asking what metrics would you use in a post-toolbar PR world. There may come a day when you have to do your linking decisions without considering the PR of the website. It might just happen...

9:57 am on May 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:May 19, 2003
posts:721
votes: 1


The day of the small guy has gone as this takes significant resources for a return far in the future for new sites.

I have to agree with you on this one. I would have never succeeded on my own, that’s why I have a team.

You could be a one man show and always outsource?

Cash is king? + brains

2:58 pm on May 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 24, 2002
posts:1094
votes: 0


"I don't see those sorts of lags. FWIW. Unless a site's already in the cooler. "

In Yahoo, MSN, no, but for google from conception (new domain) to good listings is 9 months +.

12:05 pm on May 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 8, 2004
posts:63
votes: 0


That's not possible for you to know. Toolbar PR is updated once every three months.

thank you for making that clear, i read before that it was monthly. That makes me happy to see how much is climbed in two cycles..can't wait till it hits 4 cycles -=o)

5:23 pm on May 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member caveman is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 17, 2003
posts:3744
votes: 0


> for google from conception (new domain) to good listings is 9 months

Not necessarily.

8:20 pm on May 12, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 24, 2002
posts:1094
votes: 0


unless you buy a domain that is already registred with pr etc or add to an existing site. Well from my experience over the last year. SO do tell caveman :)
2:54 pm on May 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 24, 2002
posts:1094
votes: 0


"> for google from conception (new domain) to good listings is 9 months
Not necessarily. "

These type of comments really irk me. If you are going to say something say it instead of saying some equilevant to, I know something you don't know

3:42 pm on May 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

Moderator This Forum from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator martinibuster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 13, 2002
posts:14935
votes: 494


for google from conception (new domain) to good listings is 9 months...

My opinion about that comment is it depends on what you mean by "good listings." The term "good listings" is not as straightforward as it used be. I tend to agree that it can take as long as six to nine months to rank well for a pet keyword phrase.

However, it can take as little as a week to rank for dozens or more longtail phrases, including weird ones like keyword1keyword1 (instead of keyword1 keyword1). So instead of receiving thousands of hits for keyword1 keyword2, you can rank well for thousands of phrases once a day. But it takes a bit of content written specifically with that in mind.

So it might be a good idea to develop some pages to address that kind of targeting (I strongly believe there is NO sandbox there), while allowing your website to percolate for whatever pet keyword phrases you are after. That's the little hole I cut in the fence people call the sandbox.

I wouldn't discount MSN and Yahoo traffic too much, either. Certainly Google puts the lobster on the table, but Y and M can still put the steak on the plate. ;)

More on the above topic here:

How Many Ways Can You Say...I Want My MTV!
Backdoor Through This Thing Called a Sandbox

[webmasterworld.com...]

2:32 am on May 16, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member caveman is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 17, 2003
posts:3744
votes: 0


Nice post MB. Still confuses me how people keep dropping more and more clues, and more and more info about links and sandboxing, and sitll others somehow just get irked. Today's youth, I guess. ;-)

Speaking of which, it was certainly my intent was not to irk; please forgive if that was the result.

I'm sure you can appreciate, as others have posted about countless times since mid '04, that those of us who were lucky enough to see or discover routes past the algo elements commonly referred to as sandboxing won't detail our information, or our most specific assumptions. Please key in on the word 'assumtions.' No one can know how the algo and associated fillters work except G. I have assumptions, informed by intuition, extensive analysis, and a lot of record keeping.

Within the constraints I am subject to (business partners and my key shareholders), I still try to find ways to correct misinformation or suggest directions when I feel I'm able, for the good of this community, which has contributed so much to my own knowledge of site development.

Hence my comments like "not necessarily".

Want info with details? No can do. What info without details? That I'm able to provide, from experience.

• Very few sites got new sites past sandboxing, to my knowledge, between April and Sept. 04. The sites that got lucky got lucky by virutue of having certain link patterns involved, and/or certain qualitative measures in place, and never went over board except in one profile noted below. Two sets of IBL link profiles were achieving good results at that time: 1) Blog spamming and other similar forms of link spamming. (A few in here know what I mean by other forms; sorry I cannot be more specific). 2) What I refer to as value links. Mojo links, as MB might say. Again sorry, but that is the most specific I can get, other than to say, read recent posts by PatrickDeese in the sandboxing threads, and read the recent trademark patent app, and read A LOT about LSI. Jake has made tons of great posts along these lines too, IMO. ;-)

• After Sept 04 it became slightly easier to clear the current algo with new sites, and notably, more senior members started admitting that they were seeing sites 'pop out' for the first time. Again links were a critical part of it.

But, by no means were links the only key IMO, since April '04. Links were a necessary element of clearing the algo since April '04. But other site/page-related factors had to be present, and othe site/page related factors had to be "not present."

I need to also say that all comments above are made in the context of this being the link dev form. But links are not a panacea. Clear?

======

'Ya know what irks me? When posters in here who sometimes have some valueable info, try to point people in helpful directions, and get grief or even nastiness for not providing blueprints. I fear it is one of the core reasons that many of the most seniors in here who know far more than me, and whose posts I miss greatly, don't post much any more.

3:05 am on May 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 8, 2005
posts:40
votes: 0


Low PR sites create a momentum, i have a alot of them that could turn gold and when they do they remember who their friends are.

I have no idea how long the average site needs to go gold from the sandbox ... i just know my traffic is increasing every month because of my link policy.

11:43 am on May 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 24, 2002
posts:1094
votes: 0


I guess it is because we always go for money keywords that it takes so long. Never bothered with 3 word phrases etc. But may give it a go. I do not discount msn and yahoo as we have some nice tools for those. If they change to a similar also like G's then we are all stuffed. So basically the result is still 6-9 months for a mofo killer keyword.
3:35 pm on May 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 29, 2004
posts:65
votes: 0


We are building into our business model a 1 year time span on getting 'good' listings in G. This is a stake in the ground we made rather than having stats to back up this time span. However on a few sites specifically targeted to one geography and a very niche audience we are ranking well within 3 months on G. We have kept link building activities very low on these specific sites.

All sites are ranking well (top 20, at least) within Y and MSN.

Golles

2:14 pm on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 16, 2003
posts:746
votes: 0


Any small guys getting frustrated and giving up?

To a certain extent yes. I have a number of sites that I normally would expect to perform well, but just labor along at 40-50 visitors/day. Some of these aren't money sites either. I could live with the sandbox but at least tell us how long it is.

It's a bit frustrating to not have any feedback. You get to the point to say, "What the heck...might as well try some blackhat techniques."

2:23 pm on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 6, 2005
posts:14
votes: 0


I am currently building new sites just to move to the next when I am done with it. I do my basic promotion thing and then wait.

It takes about 6 months for me to see significant traffic coming in. MSN and Yahoo are picking up where Google dropped the ball (meaning: since Google takes so much longer to list new sites).

So, for now I continue building a few more sites before I go back with additional promotion on the existing ones. I hope that strategy will work.

Chris

4:00 pm on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member caveman is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 17, 2003
posts:3744
votes: 0


If I were G, reading all the tens of thousands of posts by wm's who have launched sites over the past year (most of them presumably for affiliate or adsense purposes), I might think about intensifying the hurdles required for new sites to pass muster. :o