Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Reciprocal or one way to you

Which is better?

         

jpell

8:13 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hello all,
I have been kicking this around for a few weeks and can't find any info to help me decide. I would like to boost my PR by submitting articles to sites with good PR which contain a byline with a link to my site. (Actually this is a 2 part question). Is the one way link from them to me better than a reciprocal link?
Part 2: I also can't decide if I should end the article with a link to my index page or to an individual page on the site. This way I should be able to boost PR to individual pages (I think?). I read a few threads about PR leaking. What I ascertained is that PR from the index page is sort of leaked out to all of your other pages and "shared" with them. If this is completely wrong then let me know. My site isn't terribly large, about 100 pages, but I was thinking boosting page PR would be easier by having better PR sites link to the sub-pages instead of the index page. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,
JPell

bufferzone

8:40 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I would prefer one way links for the most part, unless the linking site complements the content in your site and fit in, in a natural way.

Again for the most part I would prefer links to my index page, but not all the links. Having links deep in your site gives the robots ”side doors” to your site, and it is my belief that side doors gives a better overall spider coverage of the site and insures deep crawls better then a “link to index only” site. Let the articles that fit content in your site in a natural way link directly to this content.

Life is not black and white, SEO is also not always clear cut. Good compromises is often the way to go and what makes the more successful site is the quality of the compromises you make

beren

8:46 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



One way is usually better. Don't put a link on your site unless there is a good reason to (other than trading links.)

HitsRiot

11:12 pm on Apr 2, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



One way links are definately better!

But you should put all links to your index page...then place a sitemap link on the index page so you whole site gets spidered to boost your PR.

Ever tried to check on a search engine who is linking to your site? You would naturally type in your index URL. You dont want to be thee for hours typing in every page you have! In your case over 100!

Hopes this helps with your decision?

PM me if you need a hand

howiejs

2:10 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have been trying to "mix" it up - with links to the index page in addition to deep sub pages . . .

Is it good to have in a submitted article 2 links - 1 to your index page and 1 to a "deeper" page - maybe the page that has the original article on your site?

tbear

2:19 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Ermmm, just to rock the boat a little, I have found that an outbound link or two, without reciprocal, is well worth while. Asuming the site has something worthwhile to link to.
I tried this recently and, to my surprise, I got pole position for a, locally, important keyword. I have just one page (of about 50) aiming at this keyword!
Linking for linking's sake, IMHO, is not the way to go.

HitsRiot

4:18 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes I agree with you tbear

cyberfyber

4:29 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I find that one way links are always best unless you deal with it creatively.

Let's say your widget site has a page on blue, purple striped, yellow poka-dotted widgets then you could of course link to a relevant site from such page which only lends your site more credibility.....and in turn have such site link to your homepage. Tit for Tat with good reasoning.

On another note, if you've more than one site, then be even more creative and incorporate what I call the "drip down effect" or "pyramid effect" in which no smaller (lesser known site) of yours links upwards, but they all link downwards, and in turn:

IF linking outwardly to other sites, have them link to one of your other sites whereas, you link to them from yet another of your sites. Thus, everyone's happy depending on the standing of the sites in question. It takes a bit of keeping track of, BUT, as long as you keep records (mentally or on paper) then you'll be fine. It's done well as long as you've never tried to trick the SEs with crappy linking and crappy content. Let's face it, Crappy sites are a dime a dozen.

Good consumerism all the way! Something unheard of amongst alot of folks on these forums.

jpell

4:45 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



tbear,
I agree 100% that linking with another site purely for a link is not the way to go. You probably got a "credit" for a natural link or links with regards to G (if that is what you were referencing your post to). However, were the links on a "links" page or on a content page?
:) JPell

ken_b

5:01 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I'd gladly give a one way link to someone who provided a credible on topic content article for my site, if I published the article.

And I've recieved similar one way links from other sites that have used my photos on their sites.

Sometimes the two sites are complimentary enough that we end up with two way links, but not always.

If you are talking about providing articles for other sites on a regular basis, and want to promote yourself as a content provider/writer, you might want to build a page with links to a small sample of sites that you have provided articles to.

You'd want to link to your best articles on the highest quality sites that have used your work in that case.

tbear

9:35 am on Apr 3, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>>However, were the links on a "links" page or on a content page?<<
Actually, jpell, they were on a links page, called keywordlinks, with no pr.
Silly thing is, one site owner asked me to move his link to a higher pr page. I don't think he noticed that the links page is nº1 for 'his' keyword (well, nor did I for a couple of days)!
I will link to sites giving good information about my subject (mine is an information site). I won't get involved with complicated linking structures just aimed at keeping pr (or improving it).
I have seen many sites below mine that have 100s more inbound links and higher pr.
There is much more to SERPs than pr and linking, as of course we all know. ;)
Content is king!