Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Basic linking question

does it matter?

         

LostJames

8:13 pm on Nov 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hello all,

My stupid question of the day is ...
when I link to your own other pages, does it matter which way I do it?
[mysite.com...]
or
page.html

I guess I am thinking about search engines.
Thank you,

martinibuster

8:25 pm on Nov 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



It has been recommended that you use an absolute url because it decreases the likelihood of a spider becoming confused.

too much information

8:29 pm on Nov 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Also prevents me from getting confused when I'm working with a bunch of directories. ;)

Mohamed_E

9:04 pm on Nov 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I use relative URLs (page.html) and have had no problems.

pageoneresults

9:05 pm on Nov 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I typically use absolute URIs in all navigation includes. I'll then use relative URIs in main content. The absolute URIs will prevent DNS Jacking.

DaveAtIFG

9:24 pm on Nov 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Absolute URLs make a site a little more difficult to clone and steal (doesn't seem to happen much anymore). Also, if your domain name contains keywords, absolute URLs may provide a boost some on SEs, particularly for pages that are "keyword poor."

nakulgoyal

2:34 pm on Nov 11, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



absolute links are always better. Keep them.

Splatwax

2:37 pm on Nov 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Absolute links are slower. Some of the HTML optimizers will notify you about that. Your site might be more difficult to jack, but it will also be less portable for you if you change domains or want to test it on your local computer, etc. Site-jacking type software, as well as Windows XP's "save as web page" feature aren't stopped by absolute links.

Adding the title attribute might be a good way to make up for the lack of an absolute link, as far as keywords go. I have't thought of that before now, but I don't know how many SE's care about title attributes.

Small Website Guy

5:25 pm on Nov 12, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Absolute urls make it impossible to debug your site locally. You click on the link and it takes you to the live site on the internet.

Relative urls are very basic stuff, and any spider that couldn't figure it out would be pretty poorly programmed. Google and Inktomi have certainly had no problems with my relatively linked sites.

Splatwax

12:31 am on Nov 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Oops...I meant to say "Site-jacking type software, as well as Windows XP's 'save as web page' feature aren't stopped by relative links."

dirkz

9:29 pm on Nov 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm always using relative URLs, but I think it's causing trouble, because none of my sites has the PR it really deserves :)