Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Here are some of the most horrible but very common frustrations:
I could go on like this for pages, but I still have some e-mails to answer. Just a grab of my current inbox:
"Yes I will do this but I'm not sure exactly to copy--that link cant be
opened"
"Your suggestion to swap links makes sense. The only problem is I don't have a clue of how to put your link on my web site. "
"Please can you reciprocate our pages? "
You click on "links", and get take to theirsite.3rdparty.com (and its usually a blank page with some basic text links on it).
Just looks so tacky.
Its like having a link on your main navigation to "news" but linking out to the BBC's news homepage. But then again in this case, you would be linking to a quality source and not some tacky auto-gen links page.
Im also starting to dislike carefully crafted link requests that are massed mailed out (I received the same one to both a web marketing site and a careers site at the same time, both emails claiming to be related to my site - and no, it wasnt a site about careers in web marketing! ;)).
Scott
(Although being kind enough to add details of the link text they want does at least make it that much easier to know just how unrelated the sites are (just in case I might have been tempted))
The web would be a much better place if link-begging time were replaced with site building time.
The web would be a much better place if link-begging time were replaced with site building time.
That certainly sounds true. Unfortunately, the invisible hand that is the current Google algo seems to steer things in the wrong direction...
If you want to make a few $$, it is *much* easier to build a sub-par site, get every Tom, Dick and Harriet to become your "link partner" and get a page one ranking for your KWP, than it is to build a top-notch site that will eventually gather the links required for that ranking *without* your active link-hunting!
Long sentence, but you get the idea.